Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple likely to have broken SEC rules with 'bundled' proxy proposals, judge says

Last updated

The federal judge presiding over Greenlight's suit against Apple said that the hedge fund's case has a "likelihood of success," agreeing that the Cupertino company probably broke Securities and Exchange Commission rules when it placed three items into one proxy proposition.

In a hearing on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan sided with counsel representing David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital on the so-called "bundling" argument, which alleges Apple broke SEC rules by placing multiple issues up for shareholder vote into one proposal, reports Fortune.

"Candidly I do think the likelihood of success is in favor for Greenlight on the merits," Judge Sullivan said.

However, the jurist failed to reach a decision as to whether the hedge fund would be irreparably harmed by Apple's proxy proposal, a requirement for an injunction against a shareholders vote scheduled for Feb. 27. He added that even if an injunction was issued, Apple still has the power to not grant the preferred stock Einhorn is fighting for.

According to the publication, Judge Sullivan appeared to lean toward a "wait-and-see" scenario set forth by Apple.

"It's a mess no matter what I do," he said.

Greenlight's lawsuit argues that Apple's "bundling" of three items into one proposal in its proxy statement goes against SEC rules. In particular, Einhorn takes issue with Apple's so-called "Prop 2" proxy proposal which, If passed, would remove the power to issue preferred stock from Apple's board and put it in the hands of shareholders.

The hedge fund is seeking the issuance of perpetual preferred stocks, dubbed "Greenlight Opportunistic Use of Preferreds" or "GO-UPs," that would pay out higher than normal dividends and mete out some of Apple's $137 billion cash hoard.

In response to the allegations, Apple claimed last week that the GO-UPs would only enhance Greenlight's financials and "do not serve the public interest."

Judge Sullivan said a ruling would be reached before the scheduled shareholders meeting next Wednesday.



23 Comments

suddenly newton 15 Years · 13819 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider 

In a hearing on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan sided with counsel representing David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital on the so-called "bundling" argument, which alleges Apple broke CES rules by placing multiple issues up for shareholder vote into one proposal, reports Fortune.

 

Oh no, now Apple will never be invited back to "CES." 

solipsismx 14 Years · 19562 comments

It's hard to imagine how Greenlight can honestly see itself good for Apple shareholders.

desuserign 18 Years · 1316 comments

I have to say, I still don't quite get what Greenlight wants (other than money.)

It sounds like they want free money, in perpetuity, on a preferred basis, at my [shareholder's] expense.

Is that right?

philboogie 16 Years · 7669 comments

[quote name="AppleInsider" url="/t/156074/apple-likely-to-have-broken-sec-rules-with-bundled-proxy-proposals-judge-says#post_2280756"]dubbed "Greenlight Opportunistic Use of Preferreds" or "GO-UPs," [/quote] Or Go, U Prick. What a mess indeed. How selfish this Greenlight company, completely beyond me.

suddenly newton 15 Years · 13819 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by DESuserIGN 

I have to say, I still don't quite get what Greenlight wants (other than money.)

It sounds like they want free money, in perpetuity, on a preferred basis, at my [shareholder's] expense.

Is that right?

 

They want to change the world. /s