Kevin Bostic
Apple reportedly is close to reaching an agreement with a Brazilian company that will see Apple granted the right to use the iPhone trademark in reference to consumer electronics in that country.
Brazil's largest daily newspaper, the Folha de São Paulo, reported (via Forbes) on Saturday that Apple and IGB Gradiente are looking to reach an "amicable solution" to the issue of the iPhone trademark. Gradiente holds exclusive rights to use the iPhone trademark, having registered the term in 2000, years before Apple introduced its bestselling handset.
Late in 2012, before its hold on the trademark was set to expire, Gradiente moved to release its own iPhone, an entry-level handset running Android 2.2 Gingerbread.
Apple initially filed suit seeking sole ownership of the trademark, arguing that Gradiente had not issued a phone under the brand until its trademark neared expiration. In February, the Brazilian National Industrial Property Institute rejected Apple's request, citing Gradiente's having registered the term years prior to Apple.
That ruling gave Gradiente sole rights to use the iPhone moniker with regard to smartphones. Apple still retained the right to use the brand in reference to software and other branding efforts.
Representatives for both parties have declined to comment, but both companies filed a document in court in Rio in late February requesting that the court suspend enforcement of the ruling until the two could find a peaceful solution to the problem. Now, a source with knowledge of the talks says the two companies are close to an agreement.
Should the suit issue reach resolution in the form of a cash settlement, it would not be the first time Apple has paid a company in order to secure the rights to a name it uses worldwide. In 2012, settled a suit with Chinese company Proview over the Chinese rights to the iPad trademark. Operating through a shell company, Apple had purchased the trademark from Proview for £35,000. The Chinese company later protested the sale, claiming fraud by concealment, inducement, and intentional misrepresentation on Apple's part. The two companies eventually settled for $60 million.
The iPhone issue is not Apple's only trouble in Brazil, the largest market in South America. The company also faces a legal challenge claiming that the fourth-generation iPad, released only months after the third-generation model, is an example of planned obsolescence. That suit, should Apple be found guilty, could result in the company being required to compensate all Brazilian customers who bought the third-generation iPad.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
12 Comments
[quote name="AppleInsider" url="/t/156391/apple-close-to-resolving-brazilian-iphone-trademark-issues#post_2291032"]Apple initially filed suit seeking sole ownership of the trademark, arguing that Gradiente had not issued a phone under the brand until its trademark neared expiration. In February, the Brazilian National Industrial Property Institute rejected Apple's request, citing Gradiente's having registered the term years prior to Apple. That [B]ruling gave Gradiente sole rights to use the iPhone moniker[/B] with regard to smartphones. Apple still retained the right to use the brand in reference to software and other branding efforts.[/quote] That's not what was reported at the time. At the time, it was reported that the court simply rejected Apple's request for sole rights - and that without further action, both parties could use the trademark. Of course, Gradiente might have gone back and asked for exclusive rights, but the earlier reports indicated that the ruling in the Apple case did not grant them.
They didn't use their trademark but did legal release a device so under the law I have to side with Gradiente despite their clear intention to get Apple to pay them for the iPhone name. Who thinks it will be more than the $60 million Apple paid Proview (whom I don't think deserved a dime more than the original payment)? Brazil could be a big market for Apple but China is clearly more important. I'm going to [I]guess[/I] $25.6 million. [QUOTE=AppleInsider]That ruling gave Gradiente sole rights to use the iPhone moniker with regard to smartphones. Apple still retained the right to use the brand in reference to software and other branding efforts.[/QUOTE] [quote name="jragosta" url="/t/156391/apple-close-to-resolving-brazilian-iphone-trademark-issues#post_2291033"]At the time, it was reported that the court simply rejected Apple's request for sole rights - and that without further action, both parties could use the trademark.[/quote] That's not a subtle difference but I wonder how much that changes Apple's position as they'll want that branding all for themselves in either case.
Planned obsolescence? I'd hate to be an Android vendor, then! They drop their devices like a hot potato and you stop getting feature updates--and even some basic security updates!--before you've even paid for the device! Now THAT is planned obsolescence! http://theunderstatement.com/post/11982112928/android-orphans-visualizing-a-sad-history-of-support Adding a lightning connector and a little speed bump? That's just common sense, and doesn't make an iPad 3 lose anything. You can't keep a 10 year old connector forever.
If Apple gets dinged with this, you would hope to see every phone manufacturer / car manufacturer / tech consumer good manufacturer get dinged as well.
If Apple gets dinged with this, you would hope to see every phone manufacturer / car manufacturer / tech consumer good manufacturer get dinged as well.
Appliance manufacturer/clothing manufacturer/furniture manufacturer/television show writer/artist (any medium, any industry, any purpose)…
The initial claim is so mind-bogglingly stupid that it's inconceivable such a thing didn't result in the immediate public humiliation of the one who brought it up.
And yet it will go to court. And Apple actually stands a chance of losing. Because people are that stupid these days.