According to a report published on Friday, the board of beleaguered smartphone hardware and software maker BlackBerry fought off proposals from tech giants Apple, Microsoft, Lenovo and others, each of which wanted to buy a piece of the company.
Citing people familiar with the matter, Reuters reports that BlackBerry's board of directors decided against breaking up and selling the struggling company piecemeal, saying it was not in the best interest of its stakeholders. The firm was previously under consideration for a takeover bid from Fairfax Capital.
Sources said Apple was among the parties interested in buying part of BlackBerry's assets, especially as it pertained to intellectual property. Microsoft, too, expressed interest in purchasing a share of the Canadian company's patents, though details of the proposals have yet to surface.
It is unknown what patents were being reviewed for purchase, but BlackBerry has a cache of wireless technology properties that may have shown value in light of Apple's ongoing patent struggle with Samsung, Google's Motorola and other smartphone rivals.
As reported on Monday, BlackBerry ultimately took itself off the market, instead opting for a $1 billion infusion from a small group of investors. The investment could reach $1.25 billion, the company said.
In addition to the investment, CEO Thorsten Heins resigned both his position and seat on the board, with former Sybase chief executive John Chen taking over in the interim. Chen will reportedly receive a $1 million base salary, a $2 million performance-based bonus and restricted stock units worth approximately $85 million at today's prices. Those RSUs are contingent on his continued employment and will vest in chunks over the next five years.
57 Comments
The title should have a 'their' before 'board'.
Really?
No mentioning of these recent events?
This page really is the Pravda of the tech-world...
Well, here are un-censored Apple Insights:
- iPad Air EXPLODES INTO FIREBALL as terrified fanbois flee Apple Store
- http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/8/ipad-explodes-setting-australian-store-customers-f/
"An Apple iApparatchik was straight on the scene to work out why the Air had caught fire."
and this:
- http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/07/apfelkind-cafe-trademark-battle-apple-germany
("The key factor that inspired Römer to fight back was a gagging clause. At first the US company had offered a compromise whereby she could use the Apfelkind logo on her own franchise products but not on any electronic equipment.")
Really?
No mentioning of these recent events?
This page really is the Pravda of the tech-world...
Well, here are un-censored Apple Insights:
- iPad Air EXPLODES INTO FIREBALL as terrified fanbois flee Apple Store
- http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/8/ipad-explodes-setting-australian-store-customers-f/
"An Apple iApparatchik was straight on the scene to work out why the Air had caught fire."
and this:
- http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/07/apfelkind-cafe-trademark-battle-apple-germany
("The key factor that inspired Römer to fight back was a gagging clause. At first the US company had offered a compromise whereby she could use the Apfelkind logo on her own franchise products but not on any electronic equipment.")
[quote name="Tallest Skil" url="/t/160644/apple-showed-interest-in-blackberry-patent-buy-board-refused-offer#post_2431968"]The title should have a 'their' before 'board'. [/quote] At first I thought the same thing but reading it again, it makes sense that BBRY's board refused.
AOA1! Dude, get some sleep!