The Retina display on Apple's newest 7.9-inch iPad mini shows a smaller range of colors than the high-resolution screen found on the larger iPad Air and other competing tablets, according to one analysis.
The difference between the displays in the iPad Air and iPad mini can be readily seen in the red areas. | Source: Anandtech
In contrast to the unit's otherwise impressive gains in resolution and performance, Apple has chosen to equip the new iPad mini with a display that features the same narrow color gamut as its non-Retina predecessor, as noted by Anandtech. The tablet was bested by Apple's fourth-generation iPad and new iPad Air, as well as Google's Nexus 7 and Nvidia's Tegra Note 7 in testing.
Measuring color gamut means, broadly, measuring the subset of colors a display can reproduce within a larger, predefined range. The iPads were subjected to tests that measured their ability to reproduce colors within the sRGB color space, an industry standard range of around 1 million colors designed to be used with computers. The difference is most apparent in red, blue, and magenta colors on Apple's new Retina iPad mini.
Differences in color reproduction are quantified with a measurement called Delta-E, which represents the difference between the color the display is asked to reproduce and the color the display actually shows.
The Retina iPad mini managed an average Delta-E of 6.5 across the gamut, compared to 2.4 for the iPad Air and 3.3 for the Nexus 7. Delta-E values of approximately 2.0 or lower are considered unnoticeable to the human eye, while professionals who require display color accuracy — Â like photographers and video editors — Â aim for Delta-E values of 4.0 or lower on their workstation displays.
Anandtech speculates that Apple believes consumers for whom color accuracy is a concern will choose the iPad Air over the smaller tablet by default, rendering the new iPad mini's marginally narrower color gamut — Â a difference which the publication calls "small but apparent" — Â a nonissue.
180 Comments
So in other words it's NOT an oversaturated mess like you find on, say, Samsung devices. Got it.
Oh NOW it's Apple's display. If it had beat all the rest in the benchmark, credit would have gone to LG.
Nothing like Apple rumor sites creating a "gate" out of nothing. :rolleyes:
I don’t expect 60% cacao to taste like 95% cacao, after all.
This is unacceptable. I hope someone at Apple is pounding the table and yelling that this should not have gone out like this. The Aandtech.com review goes into depth on the issue
How is it that companies with a fraction of the resources can ship much better displays at volume?