Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Scattershot legal blast from Beats 'cofounder' Steven Lamar reveals Apple is common thread in firm's history

Last updated

In leveling claims against Beats, Dr. Dre, Jimmy Iovine and others over royalties, contract issues and similar breaches, former hedge-fund manager and founder of Jibe Audio Steven Lamar reveals a number of ways in which Apple was involved in the beginnings of the headphone maker.

According to the complaint, as first reported by The Hollywood Reporter, Lamar hatched the idea to create a headphone brand backed up by technology and promoted by a prominent artist.

In 2006, when President of SLS International, Lamar spoke with music label Insterscope Geffen A&M Record's chairman Jimmy Iovine about the concept, who suggested the brand be endorsed by Dr. Dre. Lamar and his audio company Jibe then brought on design firm Pentagram to create the headphone's uniquely modern aesthetic.

Pentagram was where Lamar, and by proxy Beats, would have first contact with someone associated with Apple. The Beats account was handled by Pentagram partner and renowned designer Robert Brunner, who served as Apple's Director of Industrial Design from 1989 to 1997. Brunner is known not only for his work, but for hiring Apple's current design chief Jony Ive.

In May 2006, Iovine introduced Lamar and one of the first Beats prototypes to Apple retail VP Jerry McDougal. According to the court document, McDougal was so impressed with the headphone that he put Lamar in touch with Don Inmon, who was responsible for product placement in Apple's retail stores.

At the time, it looked as though Apple would be one of the first Beats Headphones distributors, as Inmon assisted the company in creating specialized packaging suitable for display in brick-and-mortar Apple Stores. As some may recall, popular audio accessories company Monster was ultimately chosen to run distribution for Beats Headphones.

Under the deal, Iovine and Dre would retain ownership of the brand name "Beats by Dr. Dre" and receive a 20 percent royalty on gross sales. Lamar and Jibe would settle for a 5 percent royalty rate and an "equity interest" in Beats for "contributions to the business model, product concepts, brand identity, and iconic designs."

In that same year, Iovine and Dre filed a lawsuit claiming Lamar failed to uphold his end of the bargain and intended to introduce a line of Beats headphones without Dre's branding. A settlement was reached in 2007 which the Beats executives would pay four percent royalty rates on specific headphone models designed by Pentagram and sold by Monster. The terms stipulated that Pentagram and Lamar would split the incoming money.

From there, auditing firm Hinrichs & Associates — now in control of Pentagram's rights — leveled a lawsuit in January claiming Lamar was demanding royalties on derivative versions of Beats headphones.

The action brings us to Lamar's countersuit filed last Friday, which goes after not only Pentagram and Brunner, but Iovine, Dr. Dre and Beats. Lamar is suing all parties for breach of contract, breach of good faith, denial of contract, while other actions are being taken against Brunner and his new firm Ammunition over alleged interference with standing contracts.

Lamar's countersuit comes after rumors that Apple and Beats Electronics are working toward an acquisition deal that could be worth $3.2 billion. The discussions have attracted other legal claims including a $20 million suit leveled by David Hyman, founder and former CEO of streaming music service MOG, which was purchased by Beats in 2012.



16 Comments

wizard69 21 Years · 13358 comments

Maybe this is why things have been delayed.

phone-ui-guy 18 Years · 1018 comments

All that money is blood in the water to the music industry sharks. 

suddenly newton 14 Years · 13819 comments

Sounds like another project for Aaron Sorkin and David Fincher.

leavingthebigg 11 Years · 1291 comments

If Apple has purchased Beats, remaining quiet is a good thing. Everybody who thinks they are owed money will now make themselves known. The patent trolls who would have never sued Beats are salivating at the chance to sue Apple.