After successfully defending a long-running antitrust case related to the iPod and iTunes ecosystem, Apple on Wednesday won a separate fight to keep videotaped deposition from late company cofounder Steve Jobs sealed.
District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers sided with both Apple and plaintiffs in her ruling, saying Jobs' testimony in the iPod iTunes antitrust case, taped months before his death in 2011, should not be handled as judicial record and will therefore not be made public.
In the midst of trial proceedings last week, a number of large media outlets filed a joint motion to gain access to copies of Jobs' deposition, citing public interest in judicial procedure. The rare footage is thought to be one of Jobs' last filmed appearances and of value to interested parties, media intervenors said.
The Jobs testimony was played multiple times during Apple's trial, proceedings of which were open to the public, allowing gathered journalists to report on the video firsthand. At the time, however, media intervenors argued a videotaped testimony is "far more compelling" than written transcripts already available through the court's electronic filing system.
For its part, Apple noted the court has a duty to protect witness testimony. If the Jobs Deposition were made public, it might set a dangerous precedent for the release of videotaped testimony from other high-profile witnesses in future cases. For witnesses in compromising situations, the prospect of having their sworn statements broadcast out of court would likely dissuade testimony, hindering the legal process.
If the video were to have been submitted as evidence, or if parties in the case did not object to its dissemination, today's ruling "might be different," Judge Gonzales Rogers said.
Judge Gonzales Rogers cites a prior case dealing with witness testimony:
Here, the Court agrees with the Eighth Circuit and concludes that the Jobs Deposition is not a judicial record. It was not admitted into evidence as an exhibit. Instead, the Jobs Deposition was merely presented in lieu of live testimony due to the witness's unavailability, and was and should be treated in the same manner as any other live testimony offered at trial.
On Tuesday, a jury found Apple not guilty of locking customers in to a monopoly digital music ecosystem with iPod, iTunes and FairPlay digital rights management. Plaintiffs in the case sought $350 million in damages, an amount that would have been tripled to more than $1 billion under U.S. antitrust law.
20 Comments
Unlike Microsoft, this judge has good taste.
...a number of large media outlets filed a joint motion to gain access to copies of Jobs' deposition, citing public interest in judicial procedure.
Bullsh!t
It really irks the hell out of me when the media passes-of their own selfish, click-baiting desires as
"public interest".
They want that video public just so they can plaster it everywhere on their news site and get their web-click quota satisfied.
Parasites.
Bullsh!t
It really irks the hell out of me when the media passes-of their own selfish, click-baiting desires as
"public interest".
They want that video public just so they can plaster it everywhere on their news site and get their web-click quota satisfied.
Parasites.
I'm sure to some it holds interest but honestly it really serves no real purpose to be released and as you said is wanted to generate clicks.
I'm sure to some it holds interest but honestly it really serves no real purpose to be released and as you said is wanted to generate clicks.
For once, it would be nice if these "news" agencies would just fess up and admit their National Enquirer "Bat Boy" ways and stop essentially LYING that it's for the greater good of society. Pr!cks.
I think real journalism got flushed down the toilet when everything became digital. At least in newspapers, one had to be right (or damn near close to it) as it would be seriously expensive to print a mistake on all that paper. With websites, any lies can be simply wiped out with a few keystrokes and the news folks pretending nothing every really happened.
I think real journalism got flushed down the toilet with everything became digital. At least in newspapers, one had to be right (or damn near close to it) as it would be seriously expensive to print a mistake on all that paper. With websites, any lies can be simply wiped out with a few keystrokes and the news folks pretending nothing every really happened.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: true journalism died in the mid-Nineties.