Apple chief executive Steve Jobs on Wednesday maintained his view that customers would rather own their music than rent it, suggesting he's unlikely to give in to calls from the music industry to add a subscription-based model to iTunes.
Jobs' comments come at a time when Apple is believed to be preparing for iTunes licensing renegotiating with several of the music industry's largest labels. As part of those talks, several of the labels are expected to badger the Apple chief to add a subscription model to its industry-leading iTunes Store.
The labels, which are battling an ongoing decline in sales of compact discs and the simultaneous proliferation of illegal music downloads through peer-to-peer file sharing networks, are touting the potential of subscription services to boost their revenues. They believe a subscription model would increase the consumption of music and allow them to reap monthly payments in addition to small licensing fees each time songs are played.
Thus far, however, Jobs appears poised to stick with Apple's current a-la-carte and album download model, which has catapulted his firm to the forefront of the digital download business. Since its inception back in 2003, the company's iTunes music store has sold more than 2.5 billion songs worldwide.
"People want to own their music," Jobs said.
For its part in the impending negotiations, Apple is expected to press the music labels for further concessions on selling music without copy-protection software known as digital rights management (DRM). In a landmark deal announced earlier this month, EMI Group — the third largest music label — announced that it would begin selling DRM-free tracks on iTunes in May.
"There are a lot of people in the other music companies who are very intrigued by it," Jobs said of the move. "They're thinking very hard about it right now."
The Apple chief executive is hoping pressure from the EMI move weighs on three of the other big labels — Universal, Sony BMG, and Warner Music — essentially forcing them to follow suit in order to remain competitive.
"We've said by the end of this year, over half of the songs we offer on iTunes we believe will be in DRM-free versions," Jobs told Reuters. "I think we're going to achieve that."
85 Comments
"The subscription model has failed so far."
Well, for completeness' sake, if iTunes wasn't around, the digital download purchase model probably would have failed too, but iTunes did it right. I can imagine that if iTunes did subscription right that it too could succeed despite the previous history of failures with other implementations by other companies.
I just want the subscription service for the Movies/TV shows. I don't need to watch missed TV shows more that once. But that's just me.
I just want the subscription service for the Movies/TV shows. I don't need to watch missed TV shows more that once. But that's just me.
Agreed on that Black. Shows are ok, if I didn't have to turn on the bloody TV and could just watch some shows on my Mac while doing my other work I'd be a happy camper. I dont WANT to buy most of the television shows that the networks throws down our face. A subscription model would be amazing here.
You could have it all under a month subscription service. There could be catagories to check what you want to watch. New, Comedy, Animated, Drama, etc etc all for viewing. And I do think the news needs to be in there, without that it there would be a lot of people who wouldn't buy in.
Well here hoping.
I want a subscription service and this would be my idea assuming it works out financially.
Unlimitted Music: $12.99/month $9.99 with a year contract
AND you can buy tunes for a reduced rate ideally 39 cents ..
Add to this a movie subscription service to compete against netflix.
Add to the at VOIP/Mobilebservice
Add Broadband
Add all in one price.
semi off topic.. but the fcc is licensing new bands that will be great for superfast wireless.. Hmmm Google/Apple I'm really curious if Google bids on this.
I just want the subscription service for the Movies/TV shows. I don't need to watch missed TV shows more that once. But that's just me.
No, it makes more sense to have that for Tv and movies.