Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Labels to ask Apple for music subscription model on iTunes - report

The world's largest music labels are expected to ask Apple to add a music subscription service to its iTunes Store as part of negotiations to renew their licensing agreements with the iPod maker, The Financial Times is reporting.

Those discussions are set to begin next week when Universal, the largest of the labels, sits down with Apple to pound out the terms of its renewal contract, the paper said. It cited "people close to the matter" as saying that Universal's competitors, Sony-BMG, Warner Music and EMI, have either commenced talks with Apple already or are poised to do so.

Weighing on the labels is an ongoing decline in sales of compact discs and the simultaneous proliferation of illegal music downloads through peer-to-peer file sharing networks.

Executives for the big four music companies reportedly believe a subscription service could prove more lucrative for them than Apple's current 99 cent a-la-carte and $9.99 album download model, as it would increase the consumption of music and allow them to reap monthly payments in addition to small licensing fees each time songs are played.

"The record industry, in particular, has long been frustrated that Apple has reaped most of the profits of the burgeoning online music market through sales of its iPod player," the Financial Times wrote in its report. "By contrast, they have earned only modest royalties from digital music sales because most of the songs on iPods and other devices result from illegal download."

For the most part, the labels have been forced to place their gripes aside and conform to terms set forth by Apple chief executive Steve Jobs, as iTunes dominates the legal download market in the U.S. with a more than 85 percent share.

One music executive familiar with the latest round of discussions with Apple told the Financial Times that music execs are "desperate for an iPod killer so that they won't be beholden to Steve Jobs."

Reports that Apple would adopt a subscription model on its iTunes Store have been making the rounds over the last two years but have never proved substantial. The most recent of those reports surfaced this past Wednesday, when CNN's Media Biz website cited an industry executive as saying he believed the iPod maker would oblige the music industry within the next six months.

76 Comments

hmurchison 24 Years · 11829 comments

I don't have a problem with music subscriptions as an addendum to the current a la carte options.

tbaggins 19 Years · 2304 comments

Offering subscriptions alongside the current iTunes buying model would be a very smart move for Apple.

It would essentially knock Microsoft out of the music market, as MS's last best hope for the Zune revolves around a 'cellular carrier' type of model where someone would sign up for a 1- or 2-year subscription for Zune Marketplace, and in return would receive a 'FREE' or steeply-discounted Zune. The hardware is in effect subsidized by the service fees over the length of the contract.

Has worked great for the wireless carriers for a long time now- that 'FREE' cellphone you got likely costs $200+ retail...

Apple would improve its relations with the record companies, offer increased consumer choice AND kick the last leg out from under Microsoft's music efforts all with one fell swoop by offering subscriptions (along with free or cheap iPods for long-term contracted subscribers). Seems like a win-win-win situation all the way around, so long as they don't stop offering 99 cent downloads... and it's highly doubtful they'd do that.

.

studiomusic 18 Years · 656 comments

Did the Music studios get a percentage of record player sales? No.
It seems to me that they are complaining that Apple gets too much money from ipod sales.
ipods have nothing to do with piracy. If there were no ipods, there would still be piracy (see cassettes).
What if they sold music for what it's worth? What if they started to promote live music (not just the BIG names on tour, but anyone who wants to perform and can draw a reasonable crowd at a reasonable price)?
What if they started respecting musicians as something more than money?

northgate 22 Years · 4304 comments

Screw subscriptions. I want to own the music I spend my money on. Period.

backcheck 22 Years · 13 comments

Suppose someone signs up with Apple iTunes subscription service for 1-3 months, then downloads as many songs as they want.

Then they download software that rips the DRM from the song.

3 months of subscription fees results in 100s or 1000s of songs for a mere pittance compared to .99 per track, and $9.99 per album.

Are the labels sticking it to themselves again?