Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.
Katie Marsal
Latest News
How we work: Malcolm Owen's sprawling setup
Malcolm's workspace has handled his work, gaming, and photography lives for years. Here's how he spends his days working and most of his time off.
Malcolm Owen
Lowest price: Apple's M4 Mac mini with 512GB storage dips to $699
A fresh price drop has hit Apple's newly released M4 Mac mini, with the 512GB model falling to $699.
Christine McKee
Merry Christmas, from the entire AppleInsider team
All of us at AppleInsider wish you a happy and peaceful holiday season, and thank you for reading us throughout a roller-coaster 2024.
Ending Google search partnership would hamstring Apple, says Eddy Cue
In a declaration filed on Monday, Apple's senior vice president of services, Eddy Cue, asserted that Apple has no interest in creating its own search engine and would prefer to continue to use Google.
Amber Neely
Apple's bad blood with Nvidia continues, after decades of fighting
Apple is ramping up research and development of its own AI chip to reduce its reliance on third-party developers, potentially finally completely ending its decades-long unhappy relationship with Nvidia.
Apple's microLED plans will get a giant boost from Foxconn's AR glasses move
Foxconn is moving into the AR glasses market, and that will also help Apple use microLED displays in future products. Here's how.
The dream of an all-glass iPhone will have to wait a bit longer
The iPhone 18 may become the first model to be bezel-free, but development of the all-glass iPhone is hitting some snags.
Apple's 14-inch MacBook Pro with M4 Pro chip plunges to record low $1,699 today only
The M4 Pro MacBook Pro 14-inch has hit a new record low price of $1,699, with units in stock with free store pickup as early as today. But don't delay, as the deal ends on Christmas Eve.
19 Comments
Too bad about Firewire. According to old expectations, 3200 should have arrived almost two years ago.
Right now, it's too little, too late. Both SATA, and the upcoming USB 3 will relegate it to a minor role.
Too bad about Firewire. According to old expectations, 3200 should have arrived almost two years ago.
Right now, it's too little, too late. Both SATA, and the upcoming USB 3 will relegate it to a minor role.
It all depends what you use Firewire for. SATA still uses the CPU as the controller, whereas Firewire has an independent controller. This is important for systems that are already loaded doing other things. At the same time SATA is only good for storage, whereas Firewire does a whole lot more.
As fore the Delicious Monster developers being sucked up by Apple that sucks, for DM. Delicious Library is a great tool and every time they lose someone it means that the development gets delayed. As a shareware developer there isn't really much in the way of icentives to keep someone from accepting a job at Apple.
It all depends what you use Firewire for. SATA still uses the CPU as the controller, whereas Firewire has an independent controller. This is important for systems that are already loaded doing other things. At the same time SATA is only good for storage, whereas Firewire does a whole lot more.
Firewire might do a lot more, but very few people care about that (we are on a Mac forum, not discussing the latest video rendering hardware or something).
On the mac, Firewire is generally (if not solely?) used for external storage connectivity and some video cameras (unless you count the excitement that is Firewire networking). So that's how most look at it. Unfortunately, even now, because firewire requires, as you say, its own controller, firewire devices tend to cost more than USB devices, and, as such, will stay as a limited option.
For PCs, it's worse, since most desktops don't come with the port, if or they do, it's the slower 400 type.
But it doesn't matter. It's doubtful Apple will implement it (they barely care as it is) and it would be better if they went eSATA anyway, which is more likely to become the defacto standard (as USB is the defacto standard now).
Add on to that Apple's wonderful decision to only allow a select few machines (MacPros and MBPs) to have the ability to add in PCI cards to gain new functionality (most people won't even be able to take advantage of it for years to come, anyway).
BTW, when they say "the same port", I'm assuming they mean same as in "Firewire 800", not "firewire 400". Or perhaps the Firewire 4-pin port.
Why doesn't apple just buy delicious monster and get the whole damn staff and another solid piece of software for its portfolio?
It all depends what you use Firewire for. SATA still uses the CPU as the controller, whereas Firewire has an independent controller. This is important for systems that are already loaded doing other things. At the same time SATA is only good for storage, whereas Firewire does a whole lot more.
I'm pretty sure SATA transfers are done by DMA. It really shouldn't take much CPU, I really doubt that Firewire's more CPU efficient to make any difference in anything. Even FW800 has a speed bottleneck compared to SATA. An eSATA link has one less drive controller as well, and it looks like eSATA enclosures are getting to be less expensive because it doesn't require that controller.
The only other thing done with consumer use of Firewire is DV deck control, and that's going away as DV camcorders are declining in prominence. They're being pushed out by hard drive, optical and solid state recorders.