Citing a person familiar with the matter, the financial publication said the SEC wants to make sure investors weren't misled. The probe isn't an indication that investigators have seen any evidence of misconduct.
"The good news flipped by the bad news makes one wonder what Apple knew," said James Cox, a law professor at Duke University quoted in the report. "It's not surprising for the SEC to come in and look afterward, given the pressure and publicity regarding their handling of a lot of cases," he said, referring to Bernard Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme.
Spokespeople for both Apple and the SEC declined to comment.
An SEC lawyer who teaches at Wayne State Law School said securities regulators would be hard pressed to build a case against the Cupertino-based company.
"It would be difficult, and certainly a new area of the law," said Peter Henning. "You would have to pin down exactly what they knew, and with a health issue — unlike a merger or a decline in revenue — it's not subject to definitive answers."
On January 5 Jobs disclosed that a hormone imbalance was causing him to lose weight but that he was undergoing treatment and planned to remaining as chief executive. Shares rose 4.2 percent. But just nine days later, the Apple co-founder spooked industry watchers with his decision to take medical leave through June, saying his health problems turned out to be "more complex" than he thought. Apple shares have since fallen 8.4 percent.
A corporate governance expert at Chadbourne & Parke told Bloomberg that Apple's board may have met its obligation to shareholders by announcing Jobs would be on leave.
"It's really an issue of the ability of the CEO during the period of his ill health to continue to advise and consult and manage the affairs of the company," said Edward Smith, who said the board isn't obligated to give specific details about Jobs' illness. "Someone might be able to [consult] from a hospital bed for several weeks just as well as they may do it from the office."
It's been speculated that Apple will inevitably face lawsuits from shareholders unhappy with the company's recent secrecy over Jobs uncertain health. Such suits would be the first of their kind and represent uncharted territory for the US legal system.
Bloomberg on Friday cited "people who are monitoring [Jobs'] illness" as saying he is considering a liver transplant as a result of complications that followed his pancreatic cancer treatment in 2004.
41 Comments
UH OH!
I hadn't thought of this before, but because Steve, makes, builds, designs, ships, creates collects funds, pays bills, schedules work loads, hires, fires, promotes, designs new stores, opens new stores, brokers deals, does all of the coding, concept work and SO MUCH more … I think everyone is right, we should sure Apple!
I have Apple stock!
I, like many others have seen the value go down (oh wait, ALL of my others stocks have gone down too … I have got one hell of a lawsuit to think about). But I like EVERYONE else, could have sold my shares of Apple stock at ANY time, I didn't - sue me for being stupid!
Oh, I forgot, Apple is going to close and fade into the sunset never to be heard from again, when Steve's gone!
Yeah right.
I like everyone agree this all could have all been handled better, but jesus, does that mean because it wasn't - we can sue Apple.
I was suppose to get a raise but I didn't … can I sue?
My marriage didn't go as planned … can I sue?
My car is not as nice as I'd hope … can I sue?
Mother nature as screwed things up more then once on me … can I sue.
Skip
So Steve, how would you prefer your time in prison? Going forward or the other way?
I think we all know the answer to that one...
Also, did you see the piece that said "this is only possible, because Mr. Jobs is such a figure head for Apple" "if Mr Jobs wasn't such, none of this would matter".
So because he's popular … sue him?
Skip
PS Now I'm not sure what I would do with ALL of the money I'd get from this lawsuit? Oh, just the lawyers are going to get something, oh I see.
My marriage didn't go as planned … can I sue?
My car is not as nice as I'd hope … can I sue?
Mother nature as screwed things up more then once on me … can I sue.
1. Raise - It depends on why you didn't get the raise.
2. Marriage, you have to if you want to end it.
3. Not unless someone else made your car "not as nice".
4. "Act(s) of God" lawsuits aren't well received, but given your lack of a question mark at the end of your sentence I will assume that was rhetorical.