Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

OPTi wins $19 million from Apple in patent lawsuit

In a rare public legal defeat, Apple this week was found to have infringed on a patent for computing technology and has been asked to pay $19 million dollars in damages.

An Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division court handed down the amount on Thursday after ruling that Apple had "willfully" violated three claims in a patent for predictive snooping of cache memory that helps shuttle information between a processor, its memory and other elements of a computer.

Begun in January 2007, the lawsuit is a classic example of a firm suing based on very broadly worded patents designed to catch out and collect royalties from as many firms as possible, regardless of whether they were actually aware of the patent. OPTi had filed a similar suit against AMD despite its making processors Apple and other companies don't use; it also dropped all of its original manufacturing and sales businesses in 2003 to concentrate on its lawsuits as a primary source of income.

Apple for its part had tried to thwart the plaintiff by claiming that the patent was invalid both through prior art and through the obviousness of the techniques involved. Judge Charles Everingham of the Marshall court rejected both arguments in his verdict, letting the patent stand.

The Mac maker in its typical fashion hasn't commented on the loss. However, OPTi has already gone on record as hoping to "realize licensing revenue" from Apple and other companies in the future.



95 Comments

trajectory 16 Years · 629 comments

Ouch! Well, this is what happens when Patents run rampant. Apple is just as guilty of pulling this kind of "patent everything" crap as OPTi (whoever the hell they are). Soon no company will be able to do anything without paying royalties to someone else.

macdanboy 16 Years · 39 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trajectory

Ouch! Well, this is what happens when Patents run rampant. Apple is just as guilty of pulling this kind of "patent everything" crap as OPTi (whoever the hell they are). Soon no company will be able to do anything without paying royalties to someone else.

I wonder if I could put a Patent on "Patent Lawsuits" and collect royalties forever? One of the real problems here is the fact that the US Patent office is approving patents that they simply don't understand. Remember this is a division of the federal government and we aren't blessed with the brightest lightbulbs on the shelf.

phone-ui-guy 19 Years · 1018 comments

I sure hope the patent reform legislation passes soon. And I am sick an tired of East Texas agreeing with almost every patent holder regardless of the situation. Patent trolls need to go away.

mariofreak85 19 Years · 202 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by macdanboy

I wonder if I could put a Patent on "Patent Lawsuits" and collect royalties forever? One of the real problems here is the fact that the US Patent office is approving patents that they simply don't understand. Remember this is a division of the federal government and we aren't blessed with the brightest lightbulbs on the shelf.

absolute genius

l008com 23 Years · 158 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by mariofreak85

absolute genius

I don't get it though. Apple doesn't make processors, and chipsets... intel does. Why is Apple liable for this?