Naming Apple the "Brand of the Decade," AdweekMedia attributes the brand's success to Steve Jobs, calling Apple âthe embodiment of a living, breathing person.â Jobs was named "Marketer of the Decade" and is credited with relaunching the Apple brand with the âThink Differentâ ad campaign. Apple's CEO is described as being visionary, iconoclastic, and fearless. Jobs is also up for Time's Person of the Year and was named âCEO of the Decadeâ by Fortune in November.
With 220 million iPods sold worldwide, Apple's music player was named âProduct of the Decadeâ and is compared to the Walkman in terms of cultural impact.
Two of Apple's iconic ad campaigns are represented on the list, with the âGet a Macâ ads winning âCampaign of the Decadeâ and âSilhouettesâ winning âOut-of-Home Ad of the Decade.â
The phenomenal success of the âGet a Macâ campaign is attributed to the ads' ability of allowing viewers to identify and connect emotionally with technology coupled with spot on casting. The âSilhouettesâ campaign achieves what is nearly impossible according to Adweek: defining a product without actually showing what it looked like up close.
Nike Plus was named âDigital Campaign of the Decade,â calling the concept âa product experience that reinforces the brand message.â
Apple fell just short of winning âDigital Company of the Decadeâ and was bested only by Google. Google also won âMedia Company of the Decade.â
48 Comments
Kudos to Phil and the marketing dept.
I'm shocked by the Nike+ award.
Media Company of the Decade
Digital Company of the Decade
Goes to...
GOOGLE!
http://www.bestofthe2000s.com/media-...he-decade.html
If this had been determined at the beginning of the decade Apple wouldn't even have been an afterthought. Interesting how much cultural relevance they were able to gain in roughly 6-7 years. I put that figure at less than 10 years since Apple really didn't get interesting until the 20 GB iPod hit the streets with firewire + USB combined with iTunes for Windows.
This should put to rest any doubts about the effectiveness of Apple's advertising.
This should put to rest any doubts about the effectiveness of Apple's advertising.
I'm not sure what doubts those are(?) It seems to me the question (criticism) has always been that Apple is nothing BUT effective advertising. You know; lemmings blah blah. Masses swayed by slick adverts blah blah. I'm an idiot blah blah.