Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

EU investigating Apple for anticompetitive e-book pricing

Apple joins five book publishers as the target of a European Union investigation into anticompetitive practices in the e-book market.

The European Commission is looking into alleged illegal agreements restricting competition, according to the BBC. In addition to Apple, the investigation is targeting Hachette Livre, Penguin, Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holzbrinck.

Apple entered the e-book business with the launch of its iPad in 2010. Since then, the iBookstore has also become available on the iPhone and iPod touch.

In March of this year, the commission conducted "unannounced inspections" of companies in several European countries to conduct its investigations. The deals made by Apple and book publishers "are to be examined for breaches of EU rules on cartels, the Commission said."

Many of the same companies, including Apple, were targeted in a U.S. lawsuit filed in August, accusing them of illegal price fixing. That class-action suit alleges that Apple facilitated a change in e-book pricing to what is known as the "agency model" because of competition from the Amazon Kindle.

The agency model allows book publishers to set consumer prices for e-books that they publish, and also allows the company serving the content to take a cut of sales. That allows Apple to take a 30 percent share of titles sold on the iBookstore.

That differs from the "wholesale model," where publishers simply suggest a recommended retail price. But with the wholesale model, booksellers are free to set their own prices and offer discounts if they choose.

A similar anticompetitive inquiry was initiated in the U.S. in August of 2010. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, after finding that prices of bestsellers on Amazon's Kindle and Apple's iBooks platforms, expressed concerns that the deals made with book publishers could be anticompetitive.



46 Comments

firefly7475 14 Years · 1501 comments

Connotes for people that read this and are still scratching their heads:

  • Amazon was allowing customers to subsidize the cost of their Kindle with cheap eBooks (e.g. if each eBook is $10 cheaper than the paperback equivalent after you buy 10 books the Kindle has "paid for itself")
  • The publishers didn't like this because the money used to subsidize the Kindle was coming out of their pockets.
  • Apple didn't like competing with "free" hardware.
  • Allegedly under Apple's guidance the publishers colluded to change the pricing model to increase prices and screw Amazon over.

monstrosity 17 Years · 2227 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475

Connotes for people that read this and are still scratching their heads:
  • Amazon was allowing customers to subsidize the cost of their Kindle with cheap eBooks (e.g. if each eBook is $10 cheaper than the paperback equivalent after you buy 10 books the Kindle has "paid for itself")
  • The publishers didn't like this because the money used to subsidize the Kindle was coming out of their pockets.
  • Apple didn't like competing with "free" hardware.
  • Allegedly under Apple's guidance the publishers colluded to change the pricing model to increase prices and screw Amazon over.

Thanks! I was hoping someone would decipher the above for me.

gwydion 16 Years · 1083 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475

Connotes for people that read this and are still scratching their heads:
  • Amazon was allowing customers to subsidize the cost of their Kindle with cheap eBooks (e.g. if each eBook is $10 cheaper than the paperback equivalent after you buy 10 books the Kindle has "paid for itself")
  • The publishers didn't like this because the money used to subsidize the Kindle was coming out of their pockets.
  • Apple didn't like competing with "free" hardware.
  • Allegedly under Apple's guidance the publishers colluded to change the pricing model to increase prices and screw Amazon over.

It's slightly different. Prior to the agency model, Amazon was free to price the books as they like, even at a loss. After the agency model was set, Amazon has to sell the books at the prices that publishers say

aplnub 20 Years · 2385 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475

Connotes for people that read this and are still scratching their heads:
  • Amazon was allowing customers to subsidize the cost of their Kindle with cheap eBooks (e.g. if each eBook is $10 cheaper than the paperback equivalent after you buy 10 books the Kindle has "paid for itself")
  • The publishers didn't like this because the money used to subsidize the Kindle was coming out of their pockets.
  • Apple didn't like competing with "free" hardware.
  • Allegedly under Apple's guidance the publishers colluded to change the pricing model to increase prices and screw Amazon over.

And your last point is partially mentioned in the Steve Jobs biography.

charlituna 16 Years · 7217 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475

Connotes for people that read this and are still scratching their heads:
[*]The publishers didn't like this because the money used to subsidize the Kindle was coming out of their pockets.

There was also the feeling that the prices devalued many books which publishers didn't like. It's hard to get someone to buy a $35 hardcover new release when you can get the ebook for $10.