Judge Andreas Voss handed down the ruling that echoed the German court's rejection to a similar suit one week ago, though he stopped short of announcing the reason behind the decision, reports Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents.
Mueller, who attended the hearing, explains that the outcome may be based on the validity of specific details regarding the case, and notes that Samsung's two losses don't necessarily affect the company's three pending claims. However, if the basis of the ruling stemmed from patent exhaustion, it is likely that the remaining wireless patent cases will be thrown out.
The South Korean electronics maker has brought five suits against Apple in Germany, arguing that the Cupertino, Calif., company infringed on certain 3G/UMTS wireless standards patents.
So far, Samsung has been largely unsuccessful in Mannheim as it lost the first two complaints in the span of one week, however the company has the option to appeal to the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court.
In addition to the 3G patent claims, Samsung has lodged two separate non-standards-related patent complaints against the Cupertino, Calif., including one involving the use of emoticons on mobile devices.
Mannheim Regional Court in Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Today's news comes after Apple filed its own suit in Germany seeking a ban on Samsung's Galaxy S II smartphone as well as nine other handsets and five tablet models.
The iPad maker was successful in forcing a redesign of the Galaxy Tab, though a subsequent suit claiming that the new design still infringes on the iPad's looks is seen as an unlikely win for Apple.
Most recently, Apple was dealt a blow by a Dutch court that found the Galaxy Tab 10.1 to not infringe on the iPad's industrial design.
The epic patent battle began in Germany when Apple first sued Samsung in April 2011 for allegedly copying the look and feel of the iPhone and iPad. Since then, the two companies have been at loggerheads over a number of lawsuits, with cases in 10 countries spanning across four continents.
17 Comments
Wouldn't it be nice if these companies stopped suing each other and focused on good products?
Wouldn't it be nice if these companies stopped suing each other and focused on good products?
The problem for Apple is your suggestion would give a free hand to all those ripping of Apple's IP. Apple have to defend their innovation even as if it results in all these counter or preemptive suits. I'm sure if Apple sat back and kept quiet while everyone ripped them off, they would be facing far less but what good would being ripped off have done Apple?
Wouldn't it be nice if these companies stopped suing each other and focused on good products?
I have it on good authority that Apple's legal team are, in no way, shape, or form, involved in the production of their thoroughly excellent products and services.
Hence, you should get your wish.
Wouldn't it be nice if these companies stopped suing each other and focused on good products?
Why can't they sue each other and focus on good products? I am pretty sure the engineers aren't moonlights as lawyers.
Why can't they sue each other and focus on good products? I am pretty sure the engineers aren't moonlights as lawyers.
It appears that this might be the case for Samsung...