AppleInsider Staff
Apple has won a decisive victory in a long-running intellectual property fight over Siri in China, as the Beijing Higher People's Court has decided that the company's personal digital assistant does not infringe on patents held by Shanghai-based Zhizhen Network Technology.
"The move means Apple's Siri voice recognition system did not infringe the protected rights of other patents and Apple fans can continue enjoying the conveniences brought by the technology," the court said when announcing the ruling, according to AFP. The dispute has been winding its way through the courts for nearly three years.
Zhizhen first sued Apple in 2012, alleging that Siri violated Zhizhen patents used on its "Xiaoi Bot" application. Apple subsequently attempted to have the patent invalidated, and then filed suit against China's State Intellectual Property Office after being rebuffed.
After losing that fight, Apple appealed to the Beijing Higher People's Court.
China is an increasingly important market for Apple, and the company has faced a number of legal challenges as it grows its Chinese operations and encroaches on local players. A previous trademark case — Â involving the iPad trademark — against Chinese display makers Proview resulted in a $60 million settlement.
Marko Zivkovic
Wesley Hilliard
Oliver Haslam
Christine McKee
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher-xl-m.jpg)
9 Comments
Ka-blammo!
I find it a bit strange that a higher appellate court would add the statement " Apple fans can continue enjoying the conveniences brought by the technology" to their ruling. It gives the impression that the court is a supporter of Apple which obviously affects its image of impartiality.
I can't imagine the US Court of Appeals ever saying something like that.
I find it a bit strange that a higher apellate court would add such the statement " Apple fans can continue enjoying the conveniences brought by the technology" to their ruling. It gives the impression that the court is a supporter of Apple which obviously affects its image of impartiality.
I can't see the US Court of Appeals ever saying something like that.
It might also be an example of translation ambiguity.
Go SIRI. Go Go Go...
The iBooks ruling should be overturned soon.
No matter what level court you are in, in the end its always the same PRC government.