Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Paris attack stokes the flames in fight over US data encryption

Last updated

Last week's terrorist attack on Paris sounded a call to arms for hawkish U.S. officials seeking broad oversight of encrypted digital communications, some of whom used the opportunity to rekindle discussions with Silicon Valley technology companies.

In an interview with MSNBC on Monday, Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Silicon Valley companies, particularly those marketing secure Internet messaging services, should help government agencies protect the homeland by allowing controlled access to encrypted data.

"They have apps to communicate on that cannot be pierced even with a court order, so they have a kind of secret way of being able to conduct operations and operational planning," Feinstein said of ISIS terrorists. She hammered the point home, reminding MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell of recent video footage showing ISIS leaders giving potential sleeper cells the go ahead to carry out attacks on U.S. soil.

Last month the Senate passed the controversial Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, a bill that effectively allows companies to legally share customer data with the Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies. Feinstein is a co-sponsor of the bill.

As iOS and Android dominate modern mobile communications, Apple and Google have been singled out as part of the problem for providing end-to-end encryption messaging services. For example, strong encryption in iOS 8 and above makes it virtually impossible to eavesdrop on iMessage conversations or gain physical device access, even with appropriate warrants.

"I have actually gone to Silicon Valley, I have met with the chief counsels of most of the big companies, I have asked for help and I haven't gotten any help," Feinstein said. "I think Silicon Valley has to take a look at their products, because if you create a product that allows evil monsters to communicate in this way, to behead children, to strike innocents, whether it's at a game in a stadium, in a small restaurant in Paris, take down an airliner, that's a big problem."

Bloomberg reports other top-ranking U.S. officials, including CIA Director John Brennan, made similar comments, but fell short of asking that new laws be enacted.

"There are a lot of technological capabilities that are available right now that make it exceptionally difficult — both technically as well as legally — for intelligence security services to have insight that they need," Brennan said today at an event in Washington, D.C.

For its part, Apple has been a vocal advocate of consumer privacy and pushed back against CISA alongside other tech companies in October. CEO Tim Cook has repeatedly warned of the detrimental effects a back door policy would have not only on individual users, but the tech industry as a whole.

Critics to Apple's position argue CISA lets providers share data while still maintaining privacy, a proverbial win-win situation for everyone involved. Americans could find themselves putting to those claims to the test sooner rather than later, as the bill is headed to the House of Representatives and, if passed, to President Obama for ratification.



155 Comments

9secondko 20 Years · 869 comments

When the US citizens lose their freedoms and privacy out of fear of terrorists, that's when the terrorists win.

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

Just wait until war profiteer and hawk Feinstein has her personal information hacked and posted on the web. You know it's coming. "Trust no one" is best applied to those hiding behind the ruse of public safety being more important than liberty.

gadgetcanadav2 11 Years · 691 comments


These idiot lawmakers just want to wiretap everyone. Do they really think we are all stupid enough to believe the terrorists will keep using iMessage after the US makes it mandatory by law to have a backdoor? No they will use other end-to-end encrypted technology and software freely available on the internet and the rest of the population will be open to NSA snooping into our lives. The arguments these lawmakers are completely flawed and make absolutely no sense. Don't believe the lies from these fear-mongerers.

suddenly newton 14 Years · 13819 comments

No better example of [I][URL=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_fear]argumentum in terrorem[/URL][/I]. Recent tragic events didn't make their arguments for encryption back doors any more valid or sound. It's just the equivalent of them asking, "so are you scared enough yet to give us what we want?"

rogifan 13 Years · 10667 comments

If the world wasn't so damn PC and we could do proper profiling this wouldn't be an issue.