Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple-supported US Email Privacy Act passes unanimous House vote, with compromises

The U.S. House of Representatives has voted unanimously to pass the Email Privacy Act, a bill that has the backing of a coalition of major technology businesses including Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo.

To become law the bill must still pass through the Senate, and then be signed by the President, TechCrunch noted. The legislation updates 1986's Electronic Communications Privacy Act, officially requiring federal agencies to get a search warrant for email over 180 days old. So far agencies have only needed a subpoena, something much easier to obtain.

The current version of the bill is weakened from a previous draft, which would've required that agencies disclose a warrant to a targeted individual within 10 days, or three days if the warrant was connected to a government entity.

The bill is of special interest to tech corporations like Apple, which are increasingly banking their reputation and future sales on promises of privacy. The trend dates back to 2013, when former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed the extent ot the NSA's mass surveillance programs — including "PRISM," which involved the participation (willing or unwilling) of major tech firms like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo. All of those firms initially denied their involvement, despite evidence.

Apple has adopted perhaps the most aggressive stance, for example actively challenging requests to help unlock iPhones in cases where Apple would be forced to undermine its own encryption. The company's effort to bring cloud infrastructure in-house may even be motivated by worries about backdoors.



10 Comments

cpsro 14 Years · 3239 comments

Is there no requirement for customer notification (such as the 90- or 180-day grace period in the case of financial institutions)? Or is it just not so short as 10 days?

ireland 18 Years · 17436 comments

Obama should be thanking Snowden, he gave him the transparency he campaigned on.

gatorguy 13 Years · 24627 comments

cpsro said:
Is there no requirement for customer notification (such as the 90- or 180-day grace period in the case of financial institutions)? Or is it just not so short as 10 days?

Here's the bill as approved by the House. See section 3, subsection 2, "Subscriber or Customer Information". Also Section 4. 
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/699/text?q={"search":["\"hr699\""]}&resultIndex=1

pscooter63 13 Years · 1072 comments

And there's yet another angle gaining traction in some media outlets today: Diane Rehm's show highlighted a proposal to allow police officers immediate roadside access to smartphone usage details, in the event of an accident or other driving incident.  It's being touted as the electronic equivalent of field breathalyzer tests.

mac_dog 16 Years · 1084 comments

ireland said:
Obama should be thanking Snowden, he gave him the transparency he campaigned on.

wrong. we should be (and most of us are) thanking edward snowden because transparency (and whistleblowing) in government is worse than it's ever been under obama's watch. a simple search brought this: http://www.businessinsider.com/government-transparency-is-the-worst-its-been-since-obama-took-office-2015-3?op=1

there are other reliable sources out there. feel free to look them up.