Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Los Angeles court orders woman to unlock Touch ID-equipped iPhone for FBI

Through a Los Angeles court, the FBI recently obtained a warrant forcing a woman to unlock an iPhone equipped with Apple's Touch ID fingerprint technology, according to a report.

The woman, Paytsar Bkhchadzhyan, pleaded no contest to a felony charge of identity theft earlier this year, and was sentenced on Feb. 25, the Los Angeles Times said. Just 45 minutes after Bkhchadzhyan was taken into custody, U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia Rosenberg approved a warrant forcing the Touch ID unlock. By 1 p.m. the same day an FBI agent had managed to take Bkhchadzhyan's print.

The iPhone was confiscated from a home in Glendale belonging to Sevak Mesrobian, a member of the Armenian Power gang, and Bkhchadzhyan's boyfriend. It's not known exactly why the FBI wanted access to Bkhchadzhyan's device, although Assistant U.S. Attorney Vicki Chou indicated that the search was part of an ongoing investigation, and an attorney that previously represented Bkhchadzhyan and Mesrobian — George Mgdesyan — said that while he isn't defending Bkhchadzhyan at the moment, the FBI may be looking into hacking and "other issues." Mesrobian has been in prison since Feb. 12.

The Glendale case isn't the first in which U.S. court officials have ordered someone to unlock a device with their fingerprint, but such incidents are relatively rare and still controversial. While fingerprints don't normally require warrants, for instance, the issue becomes more complex when they serve as a "key" to personal information. Some critics suggest this is a violation of the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination.

The Fifth Amendment means that a person can't be forced to supply a passcode, and indeed that's a particular problem for law enforcement when it comes to iPhones and iPads. iOS requires that a Touch ID user re-enter their passcode if a device is rebooted or hasn't been unlocked for 48 hours, which could potentially put data out of police reach.

The FBI has been managing to crack into some iPhones, but the techniques used may not apply to Touch ID devices, which have a "Secure Enclave" making hardware detours around encryption either difficult or impossible.



40 Comments

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

As I've mentioned a number of times, for any who require complete security with their iPhone, Touch ID should only be used for Apple Pay, but not to open the phone.

Anything you "have on you" (including your fingerprint) may legally be used against you. The contents of your brain (including a passcode) are secure (for now, at least until they perfect live brain activity scans and thought visualization...and believe it or not, this is being worked on).

Rosyna 8 Years · 87 comments

As I've mentioned a number of times, for any who require complete security with their iPhone, Touch ID should only be used for Apple Pay, but not to open the phone.

Anything you "have on you" (including your fingerprint) may legally be used against you. The contents of your brain (including a passcode) are secure (for now, at least until they perfect live brain activity scans and thought visualization...and believe it or not, this is being worked on).

This isn't correct. TouchID has numerous safeguards for this exact type of situation. TouchID does not use the fingerprint as a master password and is automatically disabled in these cases:

After 48 hours of non-use.
After a reboot.
After five incorrect attempts. (You cannot be forced to tell LEOs which finger it is).
If a lock command is sent to the device via Find My iPhone.

TouchID is meant to enable the usage of much longer and more secure passcodes without the risk of lookiloos seeing you enter it.

When TouchID is disabled, people tend to choose extremely short, 4 digit PINs due to how tedious it is to enter better passcodes on a mobile device.

antonpablo 9 Years · 90 comments

Apple should provide options aside from the standard 48 hrs to shorten the window to include 12, 24, 1, to fully customizable.

longpath 20 Years · 401 comments

As I've mentioned a number of times, for any who require complete security with their iPhone, Touch ID should only be used for Apple Pay, but not to open the phone.

Anything you "have on you" (including your fingerprint) may legally be used against you. The contents of your brain (including a passcode) are secure (for now, at least until they perfect live brain activity scans and thought visualization).

Completely agree with your assessment; but can't help but find that this is yet another example of the Founders (at least the Anti-Federalists) being excessively trusting, failing dismally to see that trusting the state to never expand the scope of its powers and actually enforce its own limitations, without any explicit sanctions, was a pipe dream. Clearly, this is an area where the Fifth Amendment has been eroded; but the state bears no penalty for having done so. Indeed, even if SCOTUS should eventually overturn all such cases involving involuntary use of fingerprint readers as a violation of the Fifth Amendment, no prosecutor, legislator, or police officer will ever suffer any sanction for their part in involuntarily compelling the use of the fingerprint readers.

iosfangirl6001 9 Years · 23 comments

Rosyna said:
As I've mentioned a number of times, for any who require complete security with their iPhone, Touch ID should only be used for Apple Pay, but not to open the phone.

Anything you "have on you" (including your fingerprint) may legally be used against you. The contents of your brain (including a passcode) are secure (for now, at least until they perfect live brain activity scans and thought visualization...and believe it or not, this is being worked on).

This isn't correct. TouchID has numerous safeguards for this exact type of situation. TouchID does not use the fingerprint as a master password and is automatically disabled in these cases:

After 48 hours of non-use.
After a reboot.
After five incorrect attempts. (You cannot be forced to tell LEOs which finger it is).
If a lock command is sent to the device via Find My iPhone.

TouchID is meant to enable the usage of much longer and more secure passcodes without the risk of lookiloos seeing you enter it.

When TouchID is disabled, people tend to choose extremely short, 4 digit PINs due to how tedious it is to enter better passcodes on a mobile device.

I use the longest passcode I can 
also 48 hours seems long they should 1/2 that in future iOS or iPhone iterations just my 2 cents