Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Tim Cook included in early list of potential VP candidates for Clinton campaign

In one of the WikiLeaks-published Podesta emails allegedly detailing the inner workings of of the Hillary Clinton election campaign, Apple CEO Tim Cook was mentioned as an early possibility for Vice President and was included in a list with Bill Gates, Melinda Gates, and Michael Bloomberg.

The email was allegedly sent by Clinton staffer John Podesta as a first draft of potential, and un-vetted, vice presidential candidates. At the time of the email, said to be March 17, 2016, the campaign claimed to be "prepared to execute non-disclosure agreements with anyone we involve."

Other potential candidates from big business and tech include GM CEO Mary Barra, Michael Bloomberg, chairman and CEO of Xerox Ursula Burns, Bill Gates, Melinda Gates, CEO of Coca-Cola Muhtar Kent, president of The Rockefeller Foundation Judith Rodin, and CEO and Chairman of Starbucks Howard Schultz. The vast majority of candidates suggested to Clinton were political figures, however.

In the same released batch of e-mails, Cook was criticized for his lack of political acumen when dealing with the U.S. government regarding the San Bernardino iPhone 5c encryption issue.

Cook has held fundraising events for both the Clinton election campaign, as well as one for Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

The leaked e-mails do not include a response or a follow-up for the candidate listing at this time, revealing any thought process leading up to the ultimate selection. It is not clear if Cook was ever approached for the job, but given the sheer number of possibilities listed in the e-mail, he was probably not.

Early Tuesday morning, The WikiLeaks organization published nearly 2000 more emails, bringing the total up to 17,150. The group claims to have around another 33,000 emails to release.



62 Comments

macxpress 16 Years · 5913 comments

sog35 said:
I hope Tim takes the Job.

IMO, Tim is a better fit for public service or charity organization.

He just doesn't have the mean streak to be a successful CEO in times of crisis.

The stock price tells the whole story.

Nothing personal against Tim. He seems to be a VERY NICE GENUINE person. And that's a problem when you are a CEO of a company competing against the sharks at Google, Samsung, Microsoft, Wall Street Journal, Verge, Bloomburg, NY Times, Digi Times, Yahoo Finance, CNBC, Amazon, Tesla, ect.  You need a CEO who will take of the kitty gloves and kick azz.  You need a CEO who is not afraid of confrontation and willing to embarass anyone who spews lies about Apple.

All about your damn stock price isn't it...

anantksundaram 18 Years · 20391 comments

What about Santa Claus? Why is he missing from the list?

jd_in_sb 14 Years · 1599 comments

VP would be a demotion for Cook and a waste of his talents. 

macxpress 16 Years · 5913 comments

sog35 said:
macxpress said:
sog35 said:
I hope Tim takes the Job.

IMO, Tim is a better fit for public service or charity organization.

He just doesn't have the mean streak to be a successful CEO in times of crisis.

The stock price tells the whole story.

Nothing personal against Tim. He seems to be a VERY NICE GENUINE person. And that's a problem when you are a CEO of a company competing against the sharks at Google, Samsung, Microsoft, Wall Street Journal, Verge, Bloomburg, NY Times, Digi Times, Yahoo Finance, CNBC, Amazon, Tesla, ect.  You need a CEO who will take of the kitty gloves and kick azz.  You need a CEO who is not afraid of confrontation and willing to embarass anyone who spews lies about Apple.
All about your damn stock price isn't it...
Yes and No.

Stock price is important because:

1. Some of the biggest Apple customers also are stockholders. When the stock is up they buy more Apple product.
2. Retain talent. Most of the top level employees get 90% of their compensation from stock options. If your stock sucks good luck holding on to premier talent.
3. Public relations. Not good for the image of a company if the stock is getting beaten down constantly
4. Higher stock price means more buying power for Apple Inc. They can use their stock to buy other companies. The higher the stock the more companies they can acquire all other variables are equal.

So yes, stock price IS IMPORTANT, even for non-shareholders.

Sigh...Apple can't go private fast enough...

quinney 18 Years · 2527 comments

What about Santa Claus? Why is he missing from the list?

He's not from a southern state and not to the right of Clinton on the political spectrum.  Establishment Democrats do everything by the book.