Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Key Apple execs Ive, Federighi, Schiller talk future of Apple, new MacBook Pro

In an interview, Chief Design Officer Jony Ive, Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi, and Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing Phil Schiller dole out the details on decisions made during the new MacBook Pro development process, convergence of iOS and macOS, and more.

"We challenge the teams to do great work and sometimes that great work can be done in one year, sometimes it takes three years," Schiller told CNet. "What we really care about is creating new innovations in the Mac and continuing the story that has really defined Apple for so many years."

The late 2016 MacBook Pro revision may not be widely heralded as revolutionary, but a big change that the device brings to the platform is the Touch Bar. The Touch Bar is a multi-touch Retina-class bar, replacing the physical function keys on the keyboard, which Apple calls a vestige of computing days gone by.

"We don't design for price, we design for the experience and the quality people expect from Mac." — Apple SVP Phil Schiller

Ive, the head designer of the product, considers full touch screens not particularly useful, and mentioned that the decision to not implement the technology was made years ago.

"We unanimously were very compelled by [the Touch Bar] as a direction, based on, one, using it, and also having the sense this is the beginning of a very interesting direction," Ive said. "But [it] still just marks a beginning."

MacOS and iOS, never the two shall meet

The executives consider other additions to macOS that interact with iOS better replacements for full-screen touch on the Mac.

"It is great to provide two different ways to solve some of the same things, but they also do very unique things that the other doesn't," said Schiller. "Having them separate allows us to explore both, versus trying to force them into one — and only one — model."

"You can't try to turn MacOS into an iPhone," Schiller added. "Conversely, you can't turn iOS into a Mac.... So each one is best at what they're meant to be — and we take what makes sense to add from each, but without fundamentally changing them so they're compromised."

On the MacBook Pro pricing

Apple is facing some criticism about the new MacBook Pro pricing, with the Internet apparently suddenly tone-deaf about Microsoft's offerings on Wednesday being considered overly expensive as well, if only briefly.

"We don't design for price, we design for the experience and the quality people expect from Mac," said Schiller. "Sometimes that means we end up at the higher end of the range, but not on purpose, just because that's what it costs."

Schiller may not be completely correct in his assessment. Recent market share analyses quoted by CNet say that while Apple is the world's fifth largest PC maker, with 8 percent of the total marketshare, it accounts for half of the PC industry profit.

The first post-Jobs MacBook Pro, but the influence is still felt

The quartet of executives have clearly leaned on one of founder Steve Jobs' last presentations. In 2010, Jobs famously said that the world was in the "post-PC" era, and users would soon vastly prefer mobile devices to desktop computers chained to an office, or laptops open on a desk.

While Apple's focus has made this shift apparent, Federighi and Schiller differ on the timetable of the extermination of the laptop. The pair believe that Apple laptops will be around for at least 25 more years.

"The idea of a laptop ... with a surface on the table that you can type on and a vertical screen has made sense for 25 years," said Schiller. "As far as our eyes can see, there will still be a place for this basic laptop architecture."



55 Comments

ktappe 16 Years · 824 comments

>"We don't design for price, we design for the experience "

Maybe they should take a brief look at price. Even I, a 30-year Apple vet, am starting to question why Apple keeps delivering 2 year old hardware specs at 2 years from now prices.

hmlongco 9 Years · 586 comments

ktappe said:
Maybe they should take a brief look at price. Even I, a 30-year Apple vet, am starting to question why Apple keeps delivering 2 year old hardware specs at 2 years from now prices.

The MBP is using Skylake quad core processors since Kaby Lake is only shipping in dual core configurations. It may be 2017 before Intel ships quad-core versions of KL. You can only ship the parts that are available.

rogifan_new 9 Years · 4297 comments

I do wish they would have followed what they did with iPhone 7 and put an adapter in the box for connecting your iOS device to the USB c port. If they're going to take USB-a away give people an adapter to make the transition to USB c less painful. These laptops are expensive enough I'm sure they could do it without cutting into margins much at all.  People hate dongles but they hate them even more when they have to be purchased separately.

sedicivalvole 17 Years · 231 comments

Agreed. The price is an issue. Having spoke to two extremely knowledgeable people this evening one who works for Apple. The response was disbelief and pure laughter from the other.

The price is very difficult to justify. Certainly in the UK at the moment. A like for like model is £600 more expensive overnight. Making the spec of machine I was wanting to order £3300 when it was £2700. 

Its too much, I can see our clients scaling down. 

Part of me thinks that is what Apple wants. Kill of the Mac lineups slowly by pricing people out of them. 

Pleasant even if it is only lip service to hear they expect the laptop to stay. Shame they can't be bothered to update the Mac Mini and the other one. 

sockrolid 14 Years · 2789 comments


"We unanimously were very compelled by [the Touch Bar] as a direction, based on, one, using it, and also having the sense this is the beginning of a very interesting direction," Ive said. "But [it] still just marks a beginning."AppleInsider said:

Next step: OLED touch-screen?
That could make it much easier to eliminate the trackpad and sense gestures directly over the virtual key surface.
Even less wasted motion that way.  But only if it improves the experience of using the keyboard.


"It is great to provide two different ways to solve some of the same things, but they also do very unique things that the other doesn't," said Schiller. "Having them separate allows us to explore both, versus trying to force them into one -- and only one -- model."
Microsoft fell for the head fake.
Ballmer thought Apple was moving toward unifying iOS and OS X.
He saw a few cosmetic and functional changes being shared between iOS to OS X.
So he jumped to the conclusion that Apple would merge the two OS-es.

I can just see him bellowing "Apple is going to do a mash-up of iOS and OS X.  Let's beat them to it."
"For once, Apple will be copying Microsoft", he must have said, triumphantly.

Well, no.  
Merging the mobile and desktop Windows experiences was a sucker move.
Enjoy your retirement, Ballmer.
How 'bout them Clippers?