Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's 'differential privacy' still collects too much specific data, study says

Apple's use of "differential privacy" — a method that inserts random noise into data as it's collected en masse — doesn't go far enough to protect personal information, a study suggested this week.

Apple's "privacy loss parameters" still allow too much specific data to slip through, according to the study (PDF link), highlighted by Wired and published by five researchers from the University of Southern California, Indiana University, and Tsinghua University. While both macOS and iOS 10 are said to have issues, the latter platform is believed to be the more problematic one.

Another concern is that Apple keeps its loss parameter — also known as its epsilon — secret, which means that the company could be changing it on the fly without any outside scrutiny.

"Apple's privacy loss parameters exceed the levels typically considered acceptable by the differential privacy research community," said USC professor Aleksandra Korolova.

macOS is said to have an epsilon of 6, while iOS 10 sits at 14. By comparison, Google claims the differential privacy system in Chrome has an epsilon of 2 in most cases, and a lifetime ceiling of 8 to 9. Google also open-sources related code, making it possible to doublecheck.

In response to the study, Apple said it disagrees with many points, such as to what degree it can correlate data with a particular person. The company insisted that it varies noise based on the type of data, and that the researchers simply combined epsilons for all types on the assumption it could be pieced together.

It also pointed to policies like time limits on data storage, the rejection of IP addresses, and the decision to make collection opt-in — referring to installation and setup screens where people can choose whether or not to share usage and diagnostics information.

The study found that the iOS 11 beta had an epsilon of 43, but that's likely because of normal testing designed to weed out bugs before the software's Sept. 19 launch.



31 Comments

suddenly newton 14 Years · 13819 comments

Apple has been criticized for not collecting enough personal data, and for collecting too much. About the only way to escape all the criticism is call themselves Facebook.

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

Meanwhile they give Google a gold star? WTF?

creek0512 12 Years · 111 comments

Apple's "privacy loss parameters" still allow too much specific data to slip through, according to the study.

Another concern is that Apple keeps its loss parameter secret.

I’m curious how the study was able to reach its conclusion if the parameters are secret.

ericthehalfbee 13 Years · 4489 comments

lkrupp said:
Meanwhile they give Google a gold star? WTF?

They don't give that to the entirety of Google - only to RAPPOR, a tiny subset of their data gathering.

Though many people like to throw around Google and differential privacy together to infer Google uses it in all their products/services.

MaxxHoo 8 Years · 6 comments

It's obvious. Apple has secret parameters to ID you positively!!!
it needs multiple parameters about you to "fuse"' your data... to be definitive about what you are up to.
will it use for its services business offerings!
 Of course, it will and still claim privacy!!
it will push services based on you and your hbbots and friends circle..
Apple software will never know how to protect from cyber security hacks..

watch out!!!

Apple will know all about its users ...all my contacts, my calendar, Face ID, Fingerprint ID and all credit cards details