Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple says Norwegian political party's logo might be confused with its own, objects to trademark

Fremskrittspartiet's trademark was registered in November.

Last updated

In a relatively rare action, Apple in February filed an official objection with the Norwegian Industrial Property Office opposing the registration of a trademark affiliated with that country's Progress Party, or Fremskrittspartiet, claiming the logo is too similar to its own well-known mark.

Bryn Aarflot, a Norway-based patent and intellectual property prosecution firm representing Apple in the matter, formally objected to Fremskrittspartiet's trademark registration in a letter dated Feb. 26.

Apple claims the political party's mark could be confused with five of its own registered trademarks. Further, the logo resembles or incorporates elements of well-known, established branding and is thus in violation of Norway's Trade Marks Act.

Registered with the Norwegian Industrial Property Office last November, Fremskrittspartiet's trademark overlays stylized "FR" iconography on a large red apple, complete with black stem and green leaf. The design is reminiscent of Apple's trademark, a two-dimensional rendering of an archetypal apple silhouette.

The Fremskrittspartiet trademark, which is currently in limbo pending review of Apple's opposition, was registered for use on a range of products including digital media, printed materials, clothing, buttons, games, toys and even kitchen utensils. Indeed, the apple branding is already a prominent feature on the Fremskrittspartiet website.

Norway's patent and trademark bureau forwarded Apple's objection to Fremskrittspartiet, which has until March 28 to lodge a response.

MacRumors reported on Apple's Norway filing earlier on Tuesday.

Apple rarely takes action against potential trademark infringers, likely due to the fact that questionable branding is filtered out during the respective registration processes of independent international regulatory bodies.

There are exceptions, however. In 2017, Apple filed suit against watchmaker Swatch for applying the mark "Tick different" on certain products. Apple argued the phrase is a play on its 1990s "Think Different" ad campaign.



36 Comments

spice-boy 8 Years · 1450 comments

Apple sues all still-life artists living and dead over use of this piece of fruit. 

tokyojimu 17 Years · 531 comments

What’s next? Objecting to apple farmers’ use of an apple in their logo?

mknelson 9 Years · 1148 comments

tokyojimu said:
What’s next? Objecting to apple farmers’ use of an apple in their logo?

"range of products including digital media"

So…no!

macxpress 16 Years · 5913 comments

spice-boy said:
Apple sues all still-life artists living and dead over use of this piece of fruit. 

From the article: "Apple rarely takes action against potential trademark infringers" Hmmm......

mattinoz 9 Years · 2488 comments

tokyojimu said:
What’s next? Objecting to apple farmers’ use of an apple in their logo?
As I understand it Trademark law requires defense or the owner has reduced protection.
So Apple needs to make the claim even if the court is likely to defeat it to protect the scope of their trademark.