Future versions of the Apple Watch could authenticate the wearer's identity by scanning elements under the skin of a user's wrist, a biometric security feature that could eliminate the need for owners to enter a security code each time they put on the wearable device.
The Apple Watch is the only mobile device Apple produces that does not offer biometric security, with the wearable timepiece requiring a user to enter a PIN on the display to unlock it. The PIN has to be entered each time the Apple Watch is being accessed while not worn, as well as to unlock it for the first instance of accessing its functionality once placed on the wrist, but it won't ask for the code again until it detects it is no longer on the person's arm and in contact with the skin.
While the PIN does offer some security, it only does so with a one-in-10,000 chance of being unlocked by users trying at random. If the user reuses a PIN they have for other items as security, someone knowing that code elsewhere may also use it on the Apple Watch with a good chance of success.
In a patent application published by the US Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday, Apple's filing for a "Wearable Electronic Device Having a Light Field Camera Usable to Perform Bioauthentication from a Dorsal Side of a Forearm Near a Wrist" offers a suggestion of using imaging at the rear of the Apple Watch to confirm the wearer's identity.
As the title suggests, Apple proposes the use of a light field camera on the back of the Apple Watch, effectively consisting of multiple camera sensors and light emitters. Similar to how the Lytro cameras operate, the sensors would work together to capture enough data that it can form a complete image of a scene that the point of focus can be set to a variety of different settings.
Typically the synthetic focusing would be used with viewable subjects, but in the filing it would not be out in the open. Instead, Apple suggests taking the image while the Apple Watch is in contact with the wrist, in order to capture elements underneath the skin.
The list of features that could be detected for authentication includes patterns for hair follicle openings, vascular patterns, veins, arteries, blood perfusion in the skin and tendons, fascia blood perfusion, tendons, connective tissue, skin pigmentation, small scale folding skin patterns, pores, and bone shapes. One or more elements could potentially be used for authentication.
The images, following the synthetic focusing process, would be compared against previously-captured versions that are confirmed to be of the user. If there is enough of a similarity between the two sets of images, the system would confirm an authentication attempt, or otherwise prompt for another type of security check.
While Apple does produce numerous patent filings with the USPTO on a regular basis, it isn't a guarantee that the ideas will make their way into future Apple products and services. They do, however, offer a guide as to areas of the company's interest.
The patent application has some promise, as it would shore up security on the Apple Watch from its current state, potentially making it as secure as Face ID. Crucially, as the check is performed on the wrist, the Apple Watch knows it is the user wearing it and not the correct PIN being used while on a different person's wrist, enabling the Apple Watch to further protect a user's sensitive data.
Sub-dermal security has been explored elsewhere by Apple. A patent application from March 14 put forward the idea of using vein matching technology to scan areas below the skin as part of a Face ID check would further enhance an already quite secure system, enabling it to determine the difference between visually identical twins by simply seeing different vein patterns.
20 Comments
Huh? A PIN isnt always required if your AppleWatch is tethered to an iPhone that does the authentication. Most days When I put on Watch my iphone X eliminates the tedium.
that's too much tech for a relatively cheap device.
Why do you say 1 in 10,000? My watch PIN is 8 digits. That makes it 1 in 100,000,000, does it not?
I guess that tech could be coupled with future medical features, but only for authentication is a little overkill. Maybe they can just keep improving on FaceID to become smaller and just use that. For now, just save the money and give me sapphire glass on the sport model at the same price point. Of all the models that could benefit from a scratch resistant screen, the one most likely to be banged around on workout equipment should definitely have it.