Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Lexar launches Professional SL100 Pro Portable SSD with USB 3.1 Gen 2 speeds

Storage maker Lexar on Wednesday announced the Mac-compatible Professional SL100 Pro Portable SSD, its signature feature being a USB-C port with with USB 3.1 Gen 2 speeds.

Incorporating Gen 2 allows the drive to hit read speeds up to 950 megabytes per second, and write at 900 megabytes per second, Lexar said. DataVault Lite is included for 256-bit AES encryption, and its chassis is built to be drop- and shock-resistant.

Two cables are included: one for "pure" USB-C connections, and another to connect to USB-A ports at the expense of performance.

Another selling point is size. The product is a little over 0.4 inches thick, and less than 3 inches long, making it possible to stash in a pants pocket.

The drive will ship later in April. Three capacities are planned: 250- and 500-gigabyte models will be $99.99 and $149.99, respectively, while a 1-terabyte model will jump to $279.99.

Watch the Latest from AppleInsider TV

13 Comments

elijahg 19 Years · 2868 comments

I don't think i'll ever get over the ridiculousness of calling USB "USB 3.1 Gen-2"... it's just dumb.

gatorguy 14 Years · 24708 comments

elijahg said:
I don't think i'll ever get over the ridiculousness of calling USB "USB 3.1 Gen-2"... it's just dumb.

omshardware.com/news/difference-between-usb-3.1-gen1-usb-3.1-gen2,36941.html

sflocal 17 Years · 6161 comments

It would be nice to see this as a TB3 drive that falls back to USBc if the host doesn’t support TB3.

elijahg 19 Years · 2868 comments

gatorguy said:
elijahg said:
I don't think i'll ever get over the ridiculousness of calling USB "USB 3.1 Gen-2"... it's just dumb.
omshardware.com/news/difference-between-usb-3.1-gen1-usb-3.1-gen2,36941.html

I know the difference, it's just stupid to add further ambiguity to the versioning. What's wrong with USB 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 etc?

gatorguy 14 Years · 24708 comments

elijahg said:
gatorguy said:
elijahg said:
I don't think i'll ever get over the ridiculousness of calling USB "USB 3.1 Gen-2"... it's just dumb.
omshardware.com/news/difference-between-usb-3.1-gen1-usb-3.1-gen2,36941.html
I know the difference, it's just stupid to add further ambiguity to the versioning. What's wrong with USB 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 etc?

Ah, understood. I personally use 3.0 etc to describe them.