Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple investigating using Apple Watch to continually measure blood pressure

Future Apple Watches may be able to measure blood pressure as well as heart rate

Last updated

Instead of the periodic or on-demand measurement of heart rate that the Apple Watch can currently do, future devices may provide constant monitoring.

Perhaps the very first health feature of the Apple Watch was its ability to sense heart rate. Five years and six versions on, it's still a key feature — and Apple continues to research how to add blood pressure measurements to it.

A pair of newly-revealed patent applications show that Apple wants to make it possible for the Apple Watch to continually monitor blood pressure. "Electrical Coupling of Pulse Transit Time (PTT) Measurement System to Heart for Blood Pressure Measurement," says that it can be done without interruption to the user.

"Current ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement approaches... fail to provide continuous measurement of blood pressure," it says. "Additionally, when an oscillometric blood pressure measurement cuff is used to monitor a person's blood pressure when sleeping, the intermittent inflation and deflation of the cuff can disturb the person's sleeping pattern, thereby harming the subject to some extent and potentially changing the person's sleeping blood pressure."

"Thus, convenient and effective approaches for noninvasive continuous measurement of blood pressure remain of interest," it continues.

Both this, and the similar "Blood Pressure Monitoring Using a Multi-Function Wrist-Worn Device" patent application, propose using the Watch as just one part of the process. In each of these new applications, the Watch will measure blood pressure by timing how long it takes a pulse to reach it from the user's heart.

"Output from a pulse arrival sensor coupled to the wrist-worn device is processed to detect when a blood pressure pulse generated by ejection of the volume of blood from the left ventricle arrives at the wrist," says the first patent application.

"A pulse transit time (PTT) for transit of the blood pressure pulse from the left ventricle to the wrist is calculated," it continues.

This does mean the user wearing electrodes or some other kind of sensor as well as the Apple Watch. So it's not going to be adopted by everyone, it will be used when medical advice recommends continuous study.

Detail from the patent showing positioning of sensors Detail from the patent showing positioning of sensors

"Home blood pressure measurements may be recommended where information is desired regarding the effectiveness of blood pressure lowering medication," explains Apple, "and/or where doubt exists as to the reliability of ambulatory blood pressure measurement."

Apple has previously investigated doing continuous heart rate measures without the use of extras such as electrodes, or a blood pressure cuff.



17 Comments

Wgkrueger 8 Years · 352 comments

An Apple Watch with this feature would would be one that I’d gladly upgrade to.

GeorgeBMac 8 Years · 11421 comments

This would be great! 
Most physicians now agree that in-office blood pressure is less than accurate -- not only are they dealing with "white coat syndrome" but even variations in how different people take it.   I cringe when a nurse with a dime store stethoscope uses an 8" cuff on my arm -  it guarantees a bad reading.    For myself, when I was working in a hospital I started using only machine readings to help smooth out the variations between how different staff recorded it.  (One would think they would know how to do it, but...)

The consensus is swinging over to at least considering, if not relying on, mobile (home based) measurements.
My own (bad) experience with office based measurements was when I saw a PA in a cardiologist's office and, right before taking my blood pressure, she started nagging me about something contentious.   My pressure came out 20 points higher than normal!

But, as a nurse one experience was eye opening:   when working in a children's hospital I took a kid's pressure but for some reason my instincts told me to recheck it and the second reading came out much higher.  So I took it again and the reading was much lower.   After the repeating the process a few times I realized it wasn't bad readings but the kid's pressure was fluctuating all over the map with wide swings up and down.   I immediately notified one of the doctors and within minutes the kid's bed was surrounded by half a dozen physicians and a very short while later he was down in the ICU.   I never heard what happened to him after that but always wondered.

Continuous, accurate monitoring would be a marvelous step forward -- especially as physicians become more accustomed to accepting data from mobile sensors.

urahara 13 Years · 733 comments

I would love it. I. Would have bought it for me and for my parents and grandparents as well. 

wrotaz 6 Years · 2 comments

In general, the measurement doesn't require another device (though it requires user interaction then): Apple Watch is able to measure ECG and pulse. ECG measures electrical signal that allows to observe a moment of blood ejection from the heart (it's electrical, so fast travelling), while the pulse sensor registers the arrival of blood at the wrist. The only problem is that it requires the user to touch the watch with the other hand to close the electrical loop, so cannot be used in background. 

MplsP 8 Years · 4047 comments

There exist such devices currently but they are notoriously fickle. The method proposed here is interesting, as pointed out, it would need an additional electrode as well as a sensor tight enough on the wrist to sense the pressure wave. This alone would keep most from using it but then it wold be susceptible to changes in sensor location and need some sort of calibration. I'm not holding my breath!