Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

North Dakota Senate debates breaking Apple's App Store monopoly

Apple's App Store and Google Play

A new bill being debated in North Dakota could see Apple forced to allow sideloading of apps, and not require developers to use the App Store in-app purchasing mechanism.

North Dakota's Senate legislature has been discussing a proposed bill that would shake up Apple's App Store and the Google Play Store by removing their alleged monopolies. What is proposed in Senate Bill No. 2333, is specifically to do with developers being forced to sell through App Stores.

The bill does not mention Apple or Google by name. Instead, it seeks to be applied to any "digital application distribution platform" for general computing, like an iPhone, which earns over $10 million annually from sales in North Dakota. There are carve-outs for "special-purpose digial application distribution platforms" like a game console or dedicated music player, which exclude stores for devices like the various Xbox or PlayStation consoles from the provisions of the bill.

The bill mandates that general purpose platforms can not require a developer to use their app store. Furthermore, platforms also may not "require a developer to use an in-application payment system as the exclusive mode of accepting payment."

Finally, they may not "retaliate against a developer for choosing to use an alternative application store or in-application payment system."

According to The Bismark Tribune, the bill was introduced by Senator Kyle Davison (R-Fargo), who claimed that App Store fees were unfair.

"The purpose of the bill is to level the playing field for app developers in North Dakota and protect customers from devastating, monopolistic fees imposed by big tech companies," he said. "[This penalizes smaller developers] by raising prices and limiting choices for consumers."

During the hearing, Apple's chief privacy engineer Erik Neuenschwander said that passing the bill would threaten "to destroy iPhone as you know it." He said that these proposed changes would "undermine the privacy, security, safety, and performance that's built into iPhone by design."

"Simply put, we work hard to keep bad apps out of the App Store; [this bill] could require us to let them in," he continued.

North Dakota has an app of its own on Apple's App Store, the contact tracing coronavirus Care19. It has been criticised, however, for contradicting its own privacy policy and sharing information with other companies.

Based on the committee votes so far, it does not appear that the bill will pass in its present form.



44 Comments

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

The Apple discussion forums are full of users who downloaded a sketchy app on their Mac only to be hosed by it, screaming for help and blaming Apple. Yet they still bitch and moan about macOS’s SIP and “signed” requirements. Triple that when developers can avoid the App Store and trick iOS users into installing all manner of scam software that compromises their device and/or privacy. Of course Apple always gets the blame when that happens. It’s like death and taxes.

It’s probably coming and it will hard to have sympathy for iOS users who get hosed by a bad app on their iPhone or iPad.

rob55 15 Years · 1291 comments

I love how they try to make their motives sound so altruistic by saying, "...and protect customers from devastating, monopolistic fees imposed by big tech companies." 
Would someone please think of the children!!!  :D

tundraboy 18 Years · 1914 comments

Will the proposed law let North Dakotans sue the state if malware through side-loaded apps empty their bank accounts?  Or better yet, will the proposed law fully reimburse victims of such fraud?

JWSC 7 Years · 1203 comments

Putting aside the merits of this legislation, questionable though they may be, I’m not sure this can be done at the state level.  Interstate commerce remains the realm of the federal Government.

It would be enlightening to know who is behind this legislative push.  As Deepthroat would have said, “Follow the money.”