Glass can shatter when dropped, but Apple is investigating the use of it for future AirPods Max because it looks great — and can have better acoustic properties that aluminum.
Apple's current AirPods Max have earcups made chiefly from anodized aluminium, yet a newly granted patent shows this could change to glass. "Techniques for improving glass earcup drop performance," is chiefly concerned less with why you might want to do this, and more about the problems if you do.
"Headphones have been in use for over 100 years, but the design and performance of the earpieces that are held against the ears of a user by a headband have remained somewhat static," says Apple. "Thus, there is a need for improved design and performance of the headphone earpieces."
So Apple is happy with the headband, it's less keen on how the two earpieces, or earcups, perform. Apple wants to use the earcups to add touch sensors, and it wants to improve the look of them.
"Earcup[s] may include a touch sensor area that can be configured to allow a user to manipulate settings and the playback of media," continues the patent. "[And] may be made from various materials such as polycarbonate and/or glass."
"Polycarbonate is advantageous in that it is shatter resistant, however, it is prone to scratching," says Apple. "Glass is advantageous in that it is more scratch resistant and cosmetically more appealing than polycarbonate, however."
The patent keeps coming back to this issue of "the cosmetic appeal of the earpiece," when it's made from glass. It does not use the words "acoustic," or "audio," once, but these are issues that glass has an impact on.
If Apple does turn to using glass earcups, it will affect how much ambient noise gets through to the wearer. The $2,000 Sennheiser HD 820 headphones, for instance, incorporate glass to minimize resonances and contribute to a realistic, natural sound.
Glass can block some sounds, reduce others, and allow certain frequencies to pass through. So its very properties could make an improved AirPods Max, if it weren't for this issue of how glass "is more prone to shattering than polycarbonate."
Apple's proposal is to have "an outer exposed surface" made of glass, but then "an annular edge" plus "protective adhesive coating." An annular edge is a flattened ring, effectively made of two concentric circles.
Then the soft textile portion, which presses against the wearer's ears, may be extended to form "a gap between the textile and the annular edge."
Ultimately, Apple's patent is about having "a glass earcup" with "an outer exposed surface... and edges extending around the perimeter of the glass earcup." It's presumably this edge that is intended to absorb the impact of a drop.
This patent is credited to five inventors, including Christopher D. Jones. His previous related work includes a design for glass panels in the "Apple Car," which feature sensors.
10 Comments
I wonder if the glass will be opaque or translucent. The latter with a light tint would look great, like the old iSub, but color matched to iPhones.
Apple had (has?) pairs of AirPods with which to demo to potential customers. Will/do they do the same for AirPods Max? I want to demo a pair with 5.1/7.1/Atmos content to see what they do with it. It won't sound like actual dedicated 5.1/7.1/Atmos hardware, but it might sound much better than all the various DSP processing Hall/Church/Grotto settings that were all the rage on audio kit back when.
I've got a couple pair of basic audiophile cans but they're limited to my legacy stereo kit. I'm anxious to see what Apple's iteration of computational audio brings to the table.
“ Headphones have been in use for over 100 years, but the design and performance of the earpieces that are held against the ears of a user by a headband have remained somewhat static," says Apple. "Thus, there is a need for improved design and performance of the headphone earpieces.”
when a design remains static for a long period, it’s often because there are reasons - human ears haven’t changed. Sound waves need to be produced and you generally need to isolate the ear from external noise. Poorly functioning designs typically don’t last for 100 years, either unless there are technological barriers that prevent their improvement.
The glass would probably allow them to be wirelessly charged like the back on newer iPhones too.
The glass back of the iPhone 8 was a terrible design, and was killed off.
iPhone 12 “Ceramic Shield with four times better drop performance. ”
I don’t see Apple making the same mistake twice.