Mike Peterson
Apple is rejecting apps that have "irrationally high" in-app purchase prices, just a few weeks after a developer vented his frustrations about scams on the App Store.
An email Apple sent to a developer whose app was rejected by the company's App Store review team explains that reviewers won't approve apps that are "rip-offs," citing Section 3 of the App Store Review guidelines.
Now confirmed: Apple is rejecting apps with irrationally high prices for in-apps and subscriptions.
— ilia kukharev (@ilyakuh) February 19, 2021
You have to explain why are you charging like $7.99 per week. Because of using 3rd-party paid services, or something similar.
//thanks @aso_rad for the screenshot. pic.twitter.com/8sDSny4604
Specifically, Section 3 says that Apple "won't distribute apps and in-app purchase items that are clear rip-offs." It adds that the company will "reject expensive apps that try to cheat users with irrationally high prices."
This policy has been in place for a while, but it seems like there has been an uptick in enforcement. One developer, for example, wrote in 2020 that their app was rejected for charging $39.99 a month.
There are other posts in the Apple Developer Forums that suggest the company appears to take a closer look at apps with higher prices.
In a statement to 9to5Mac, Apple said that this policy is part of its commitment to keeping the App Store a safe place for users. It added that reviewers reject apps that scam or rip off users.
Although it isn't clear if it's related, a report from earlier in February shed some light on App Store scams that make millions of dollars a year. Developer Kosta Eleftheriou highlighted many of these scam apps, which steal features and ideas from other apps, charge exorbitant fees, or fall short of what they advertise. Eleftheriou also began putting pressure on Apple to better enforce its policies.
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
Christine McKee
Thomas Sibilly
23 Comments
Good next tackle in app purchases that can be higher price for less functionality.
Just ban IAP that doesn’t unlock a pro version. Maybe allow a one month free trail instead.
The whole notion of “free” apps with in-app purchases is dishonest. Charge a fair price up front and get it all. Enough with the free sample of crack business model.
Great job Apple!!!!!
Subscription based apps (which is most of them now) do need to be realistic. Considering the cost of an AppleTV+ is under $10 a month, which costs Apple millions to develop each month, you’d have to question any subscription that comes close to even half that per month.