AppleInsider is supported by its audience and may earn commission as an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner on qualifying purchases. These affiliate partnerships do not influence our editorial content.
Security researchers have found new versions of chip flaws affecting Intel and AMD processors that get around existing mitigations for Spectre attacks, resurrecting vulnerabilities that may affect Intel-based Macs.
In 2018, an Intel chip kernel flaw was found that allowed attackers to gain access to protected data, which could include passwords and application keys. While patches and mitigations were put in place to block the so-called "Spectre" attacks from happening, researchers have determined the efforts aren't enough to prevent the attacks entirely.
In a paper published by researchers from the University of Virginia and the University of California, at least three new versions of Spectre attacks have been found affecting micro-op caches in Intel and AMD processors.
Crucially, the three methods determined by the researchers get around previous Spectre defences that prevented such data leaks. This means current processors are vulnerable to the Spectre-like attacks, despite their anti-Spectre protections.
The researchers have already disclosed their research to Intel and AMD, reports Phoronix, but so far there have yet to be any kernel patches or microcode updates distributed by either side ahead of the public disclosure.
Part of the problem is that the fix may introduce a "much greater performance penalty" than previous mitigations. Example fixes include flushing the micro-op cache at domain crossings, or to instigate privelige level-based partitioning of caches.
While the disclosure is quite damning to Intel and AMD, the high difficulty of pulling off an attack makes it unlikely that it will affect many people at all. To do so, the malware would have to thread the needle of getting past all existing security measures included in operating systems, before even attempting to use any of the vulnerabilities in the first place.
At this time, it is unknown if the vulnerabilities affect Intel-based Macs, but it is likely that they are at a minimal risk of attack. With Apple's move to Apple Silicon and its home-grown architecture, new Macs aren't likely to be directly affected by the new discovery.
That being said, Apple did introduce fixes to combat Spectre and "Meltdown," another chip flaw discovered at the same time in 2018. Mitigations were issued in macOS, iOS, and tvOS, indicating Apple's A-series chips were also vulnerable at the time.
The Spectre headache was a long-running problem for Intel. More Spectre-style vulnerabilities were disclosed in a second wave in mid-2018.
An inevitable class-action lawsuit against Apple was attempted, claiming the company's handling of the vulnerabilities had slowed down A-series chip products. By January 2019, the case was dismissed for a lack of standing.
Update May 3, 3:44 PM ET Intel believes that there are already sufficient protections with existing mitigations, despite the researchers differing on this point.
"Intel reviewed the report and informed researchers that existing mitigations were not being bypassed and that this scenario is addressed in our secure coding guidance," Intel said in a statement. "Software following our guidance already have protections against incidental channels including the UOP cache incidental channel. No new mitigations or guidance are needed."
Update May 4, 11:45 AM ETAshish Venkat of the UVA School of Engineering responded to Intel's statement on Tuesday, insisting that it is a hardware issue that needs to be secured, rather than something that can be countered with changes in software development.
"Certainly, we agree that software needs to be more secure, and we agree as a community that constant-time programming is an effective means to writing code that is invulnerable to side-channel attacks," the UVA statement reads. "However, the vulnerability we uncover is in hardware, and it is important to also design processors that are secure and resilient against these attacks."
"In addition, constant-time programming is not only hard in terms of the actual programmer effort, but also entails high performance overhead and significant deployment challenges related to patching all sensitive software. The percentage of code that is written using Constant Time principles is in fact quite small. Relying on this would be dangerous. That is why we still need to secure the hardware."
Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.