Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple may have one last Intel Mac up its sleeve

Last updated

Apple may be getting a Mac ready for release that will use an Intel processor despite the transition to Apple Silicon, after a beta includes references to a 10-core Core i9 chip.

Apple is in the middle of a two-year transition of its entire Mac product line, migrating away from Intel-based Macs in favor of its own Apple Silicon. However, references in the latest macOS Big Sur 11.4 beta point to at least one last Mac update using Intel chips.

The reference to an unreleased 10-core Intel Core i9 processor in the beta, reported by MacRumors seemingly indicates there could be a new chip on the way, though further details about its capabilities were not offered in the report.

There also isn't any sign as to what Mac product it will be included within. Apple currently offers Intel chips in the 21.5-inch and 27-inch iMac, 16-inch MacBook Pro, and the Mac Pro, with the 27-inch iMac being the most likely candidate.

Of the three products, the 27-inch iMac is the only one currently configurable to a 10-core Core i9 chip, a 10th-gen version with a base clock of 3.6GHz and a Turbo Boost of up to 5.0GHz. While the 16-inch MacBook Pro is a good candidate for an update as well, given it uses an 8-core Core i9 at its highest, the iMac is more likely.

The other two models are not great candidates for the chip. The 21.5-inch iMac is offered with the choice of only one Core i5 chip, while the Mac Pro line exclusively uses Xeon processors.

There have been rumors of a compact version of the Mac Pro, shrinking the workstation into a smaller form as shown in renders from February 2021. While a step away from Xeon, this could be another potential venue for the use of such a processor, if the product is genuine.

While Apple could launch updated models of its remaining Macs with Apple Silicon at any time, it is plausible that Apple's potentially last Intel update could be a way to appease those who simply can't or won't move over to the new architecture. This may be the case of some software that is too old or isn't actively being developed to run on Apple Silicon, which could the case for some business tools.

Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.



23 Comments

sdw2001 17460 comments · 23 Years

I'm not sure why Apple would do this now.  It sounds like it may be a beta reference that was overlooked.  

InspiredCode 405 comments · 8 Years

It may be the 16” MBP. It feels like mini LED production isn’t high enough to refresh the model unless they plan to put in an older display.

lkrupp 10521 comments · 19 Years

sdw2001 said:
I'm not sure why Apple would do this now.  It sounds like it may be a beta reference that was overlooked.  

I would tend to agree. For years now the Intel ‘problem’ has raged in Apple tech blog forums. Many have pressed for Apple to switch to AMD. Then Apple blows the whole thing up with the M1. So another Intel Mac doesn’t make much sense. Sure, the Windows-on-Mac fans are pissed but they are a small minority.

hammeroftruth 1356 comments · 16 Years

Like everyone else here has said, it’s probably an old reference from when the software was being put together. Probably when it was an alpha. 

It wouldn’t make sense to make one last iMac when most consumers are already pleased with the new design. It also wouldn’t make sense to put it in a portable since this was the catalyst to go to Apple silicon. There were many professionals who complained the cooling system in those Macs were insufficient. 

You could put it in a Homepod and sell it as a speaker/cooktop. ߘ⦬t;br>

mike1 3437 comments · 10 Years

sdw2001 said:
I'm not sure why Apple would do this now.  It sounds like it may be a beta reference that was overlooked.  

Probably, but it could wind up as an option in a new, smaller desktop in the Pro range, that is discussed in another post. One last hurrah for those who really need an Intel processor right now.