Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

USA's 2023 Real ID air travel requirement could benefit from Apple's iOS 15 digital driver's licenses

Last updated

Repeatedly delayed, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Real ID enforcement, which will require more secure identification credentials for domestic air travel by May 2023, could see even stronger uptake once Apple launches digital driver's licenses in its upcoming iOS 15 update.

The DHS Real ID program will require every domestic airline passenger ages 18 and older to carry with them a compliant, secure license identification card, if they do not have a U.S. passport.

In other words, American citizens will no longer be able to take flights within the U.S. with just a basic state-issued driver's license — they'll need to have a newly enhanced Real ID card, which is now being offered by all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and four of five U.S. territories.

DHS intended to make Real ID the law of the land years ago, but has repeatedly delayed enforcement to give both states and citizens more time. Because Real ID cards are more secure, citizens are required to provide more proof of identification when obtaining a new license or identification card — something that was made even more challenging by the onset of Covid and closure of many state offices.

Most recently, in April, DHS delayed enforcement of Real ID from Oct. 1, 2021 to May 3, 2023, citing the ongoing pandemic.

Right time, right place, right partner

These secure requirements and delays present a unique opportunity for Apple, which last week at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference announced that it will later this year introduce digital driver's licenses that can be used to securely identify a person from their iPhone or Apple Watch.

As part of the announcement, Apple revealed that it has partnered with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, which is part of the DHS, to ensure that its digital ID system will be compliant with new domestic travel requirements.

Accordingly, a screenshot of the digital ID shown at WWDC clearly spells out that "Real ID Status" will be included on the virtual card.

Details from Apple on the new digital ID were relatively light — the feature won't even launch alongside iOS 15, and is only promised to debut before the end of the year. Apple also hasn't disclosed which U.S. states will support the feature at launch.

However, the combination of receiving the endorsement of the TSA, plus the fact that many U.S. citizens will need to get a new ID card in order to travel within the country in the next few years, could drive a perfect storm of adoption for digital identification.

Security concerns remain hypothetical

As with any time new technology is introduced — particularly when it replaces something physical and analog — there is always some pushback and, frankly, paranoia.

Upon last week's announcement, NPR quoted privacy experts who raised hypothetical concerns that seem unrealistic to anyone who knows how Apple operates. One critic suggested Apple could one day require transaction fees to use a digital ID, while another said it could be a way for the iPhone maker to track users — neither of which is congruent with the company's established business practices.

For its part, Apple has revealed that presenting an ID card will work the same as Apple Pay, requiring secure authentication with Face ID or Touch ID. The new system will also use the same Secure Enclave leveraged by Apple Pay, which significantly reduces the chance of fraud.

It's that very same security that led credit card companies to quickly embrace Apple Pay at launch. Apple Pay uses a tokenization system that randomly generates a credit card number and transmits it wirelessly over NFC.

By never sharing the user's actual credit card number, the risk of fraud is reduced to essentially zero.

It's easy to see why the TSA sees the same kinds of security advantages with a digital ID. It also seems likely that many states could reach the same conclusion, and rapidly embrace digital driver's licenses as ID card requirements become more stringent.

Though culturally the U.S. is accustomed to physical identification cards, the flaws in the current system are numerous — anyone who was a teenager in the U.S. knows someone who had a fake or "borrowed" driver's license that they could us to buy alcohol or tobacco products.

By connecting a secure, authenticated digital ID card to a biometric security system like Touch ID or Face ID, the opportunities to use false identification for anything — whether it be domestic travel, or just attempting to buy a 12-pack of Miller Lite — will become that much more difficult.

It's a win for Apple, which further drives adoption of its digital Wallet; it's a win for DHS and the TSA, which strive to make airline travel as safe as possible; and it's a win for states, which are responsible for issuing driver's licenses.

Of course, there will be skeptics who would rather not adopt a digital ID card, as there should be. And for them, physical driver's licenses and other accepted forms of identification will remain.

But for those willing to embrace enhanced security — with the added benefit of having to carry one less physical card, or to ditch your wallet entirely — the new option of digital identification will be welcomed.



18 Comments

iOS_Guy80 5 Years · 905 comments

Cannot wait for it to be implemented.

zimmie 9 Years · 651 comments

Had to renew my driver license during the pandemic, which was surprisingly difficult, even knowing my state is making the process gratuitously hard as a form of voter suppression. The Real ID compliant license is easier to counterfeit in every way than my last license was. Lenticular arrays instead of holograms, no microprinting, only a little UV reactivity. I am unimpressed. Would only be marginally harder to fake one of these than a birth certificate (which, in most states, is trivial to fake).

As for digital ID cards, I look forward to more information about how they work. Hopefully it's something like the emergency medical ID. Showing it should disable the Lightning port and lock the phone such that the passcode is required to unlock it. The screen showing what will be presented suggests it might actually be sent electronically for viewing on a device which is not your phone. Would cops, bouncers, grocery store clerks, and so on have to carry around a separate device capable of receiving and verifying information? That would seem to be quite a high requirement for a lot of places.

multimedia 23 Years · 1031 comments

The “Real ID” is a $500 problem for me. My birth certificate shows that I have a first name, two middle names and a last name. When I was about 21, I discovered my second middle name which my parents denied they had given me (apparently a clerk added it from my Father’s middle name). I liked it so much that I began only using it and my last name going forward.

Now the California DMV won’t give me a “Real ID” until I go through the courts to formally change my second middle name to my first name to the tune of $500 - even though it shows my name on the birth certificate (as a second middle name) and have been using it as my first name for more than 50 years. I don’t plan to ever fly again (I’m 74 and live in a Paradise called Santa Cruz CA). So I’m not going to spend $500 for something I’ll never use. Bureaucrats. 

Hope this won’t keep me from being able to use Apple’s Wallet from storing my Unreal driver’s license.

leehamm 9 Years · 61 comments

So will a passport be a valid form of identification? You’d expect so, for travel. For credit, it is not always accepted. 

For the purposes of revenue generation, these licenses currently have a lifetime. It’s always seemed a little silly that your identification ‘expires’, for some bureaucratic reason. 

leehamm 9 Years · 61 comments

The “Real ID” is a $500 problem for me. My birth certificate shows that I have a first name, two middle names and a last name. When I was about 21, I discovered my second middle name which my parents denied they had given me (apparently a clerk added it from my Father’s middle name). I liked it so much that I began only using it and my last name going forward.

I swapped first and middle names at 17, between high school and university, some 45 years ago. No one has noticed yet. I agree: this is bureaucratic nonsense.