Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

EFF urges Apple to drop CSAM tool plans completely

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has responded favorably to Apple's announcement it would delay implementing its CSAM tools, but still wants Apple to go further and give up on the plans entirely.

On September 3, Apple announced it was going to "take additional time" to consult about its plans to launch child protection features, with a view to improving the tools and implementing them within a few months. In response, the EFF believes Apple could do more on the matter.

In its Friday response, the digital rights group said it was "pleased Apple is now listening to the concerns" of its users "about the dangers posed by its phone scanning tools." However, Apple "must go further than just listening, and drop its plans to put a backdoor into its encryption entirely."

The statement by the group recapped the criticism Apple had received from over 90 organizations around the world, asking the iPhone maker not to implement the features. The claims are that they could "lead to the censoring of protected speech, threaten the privacy and security of people around the world, and have disastrous consequences for many children."

A petition hosted by the EFF against Apple's initiative reached 25,000 signatures on September 1, and was nearing 27,000 at the time of publication. According to the EFF, the figure grows to "well over 50,000 signatures" when taking into account similar petitions from groups including Fight for the Future and OpenMedia.

"The enormous coalition that has spoken out will continue to demand that user phones - both their messages and their photos - be protected, and that the company maintain its promise to provide real privacy to its users," the EFF blog post ends.

It remains to be seen what changes Apple will make to its CSAM features, but given it is opening itself up to consultation, it won't be short of suggestions and instruction from observers and critics.



47 Comments

crowley 15 Years · 10431 comments

Well that's a surefire way to get yourself sidelined.  If the EFF can't be reasonable and have a dialogue then they'll be treated as unreasonable and unworthy of dialogue.

crowley 15 Years · 10431 comments

crowley said:
Well that's a surefire way to get yourself sidelined.  If the EFF can't be reasonable and have a dialogue then they'll be treated as unreasonable and unworthy of dialogue.
This is obviously the first time you heard of the EFF and have no idea of the work they do otherwise you wouldn't have made such a dopey comment. 

I have heard of the EFF and know what they do.  They've done some decent and worthwhile campaigning in the past, but they're very close to being no-compromise privacy zealots.  And I doubt Apple are going to be much bothered to engage with people who cannot be reasoned with given the concurrent obligations Apple feels that it has.

CelticPaddy 3 Years · 43 comments

crowley said:
Well that's a surefire way to get yourself sidelined.  If the EFF can't be reasonable and have a dialogue then they'll be treated as unreasonable and unworthy of dialogue.

It’s pretty obvious you have no idea what “reaonable” means. 

crowley 15 Years · 10431 comments

crowley said:
Well that's a surefire way to get yourself sidelined.  If the EFF can't be reasonable and have a dialogue then they'll be treated as unreasonable and unworthy of dialogue.
It’s pretty obvious you have no idea what “reaonable” means. 

Not even listening to what the other person is saying is pretty much dictionary definition of unreasonable.