Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Epic appealing Apple's 'resounding victory' in App Store trial

Epic to appeal Apple's 'huge win'

Last updated

As Apple declares victory in the Epic vs. Apple App Store trial, Epic has announced it will appeal the court's ruling.

Apple won on every count in the Epic versus Apple case except for one — anti-steering practices. As a result, the company is required to allow developers to link to external payment methods within the next 90 days.

In a statement to AppleInsider, Apple General council Kate Adams shared Apple's positive reaction to the news. She says the decision is a "resounding victory" and validates that Apple's "success is not illegal."

"The Court correctly rejected Epic's 'artificial' view of the competitive environment in which Apple operates and determined that 'developers like Epic Games have benefited from Apple's development and cultivation of the iOS ecosystem, including its devices and underlying software,'" Adams said in the statement. "Underlying the App Store business is a framework, including App Review, curation and protection of the security and privacy of our users. The Court has ruled that this framework is lawful and Apple was justified in terminating Epic's status as a developer on the App Store."

Epic didn't come away from the ruling completely clean. The company is required to pay Apple 30% of the $12,167,719 in revenue collected through Epic Direct Payment, plus 30% of any revenue collected relevant to iOS through November 1 to date of judgement, plus interest.

At nearly the same time as Apple's statement, Epic announced that it will appeal the court's decision. What precisely it is appealing and on what grounds isn't clear.

Apple did not detail how the court ruling's ban on steering anti-practices would affect apps on the App Store, only stating that it prohibits the company from enforcing those steering guidelines. The company says no decision has been made on the implementation of new steering policies.



24 Comments

maestro64 20 Years · 5029 comments

He's pissed we wasted the companies money fighting this case and wants another go at it since his lawyers suck and he need to find new one.

sflocal 17 Years · 6142 comments

I wish it were a 100% victory for Apple, but happy that Sweeney got his a** handed to him.  Expecting Apple to literally do all the work of keeping and getting new users for its iPhone only to let Sweeney solely profit from it?  Screw him.

gerard 12 Years · 83 comments

Now all of the developers who stated they charge higher prices for apps because of Apple’s cut to show and prove. We should see  a slew of apps cutting prices. They were acting as if other payment platforms would collect their revenue for them free of charge…

mike1 11 Years · 3438 comments

maestro64 said:
He's pissed we wasted the companies money fighting this case and wants another go at it since his lawyers suck and he need to find new one.
Not sure any lawyer would have made this a case.
Sometimes the good ones don't take the cases they know they can't win.