Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

The Apple Watch 'future of health' on your wrist is likely still years away, say doctors

An Apple Watch's blood oxygen mode

Apple's vision of the Apple Watch being "the future of health" may be years off due to slow acceptance from the medical community and the focus on gathering — but not making use — of data.

In a new piece by The Financial Times, a number of doctors and others in the medical field have detailed the difficulties in incorporating the Apple Watch into the daily care of patients. Some said that a future where the Apple Watch actually improves user health on a larger scale is still a ways off.

While the Apple Watch and similar devices can collect many useful data points — which, in some cases, can be clinical grade — most doctors aren't using it. For example, clinical psychologist Michael Breus says that 99.9% of medical professionals aren't onboard yet.

"The problem is, that is not accepted by the medical community and it won't be for quite some time," said Dr. Steven LeBoeuf, co-founder of biometrics firm Valencell. "The [FDA] would have to approve it and then doctors have to accept it, and then they need to get reimbursed for it. That's a long process. It's not as straightforward as one would think."

Another problem is what to do with the data that the Apple Watch collects. Virta Health CEO Sami Inkinen says that just giving people data without personalized care recommendations isn't enough to improve health.

"It's like selling someone a scale: it's not very hard to tell people what percentage they are overweight," said Inkinen. "But how do we actually change behaviour and drive results, like getting your blood sugar down, getting you off the medication and getting your weight down? For me, that is completely missing from the Apple Watch."

Additionally, research indicates that many Apple Watch users already identify as healthy and fit, so it's likely that the device's target market doesn't include the people for whom the Apple Watch could bring the most benefits.

However, some doctors are hopeful that the Apple Watch could be used for both patient care and research purposes. According to the CDC, chronic diseases were the "leading driver" of America's $3.8 trillion in healthcare costs. They're also generally preventable by exercise, diet, and early detection.

Shruthi Mahalingaiah, a researcher at Harvard, has been using various generations of the Apple Watch to track the ovulation cycle of 70,000 women in a large study.

Dr. Richard Milani, a vice-chair of cardiology as Ochsner Health, has been using data-collecting devices to monitor data points from thousands of patents and use AI to predict outcomes like which people are more likely to fall.

However, Milani acknowledged that "normal doctors are not doing all this."

Apple, for its part, has been making progress toward a health and wellness goal. It's partnered with companies like Johnson & Johnson and medical institutions on large-scale studies.

The company added that it is "still early in our journey in health." It added that it's "invigorated by stories of customers whose lives have been improved — and in their own words, saved — by the technology we design and build."



15 Comments

damankas 3 Years · 12 comments

"The problem is, that is not accepted by the medical community and it won't be for quite some time," said Dr. Steven LeBoeuf, co-founder of biometrics firm Valencell. "The [FDA] would have to approve it and then doctors have to accept it, and then they need to get reimbursed for it. That's a long process. It's not as straightforward as one would think."


The FDA gave their stamp of approval for the ECG feature arguably a much more advanced feature than the other features used on the watch. I’m confused. Does this Dr. Steven LeBoeuf know this or did he assume that is wasn’t already approved 🤨

applguy 13 Years · 235 comments

The future is closer today than yesterday. 10 years ago who would have imagined a watch doing an ECG. I look forward to what tomorrow brings. 

MarcHawk 5 Years · 14 comments

Continuous Blood sugar monitoring will be a major mover to improve health. The ability to closely keep track of your blood sugar throughout the day and knowing what the effect of eating, fasting, exercise will allow people to better manage this illness. Today we must continuously prick our fingers a painful and annoying exercise that isn’t always possible for many. Health insurance only pays the costs for those with the most severe symptoms and this makes continuous monitoring devices unavailable to most. Diabetes is a pervasive illness among the US. Population and growing. Including this within the Apple watch will  make a huge impact.

Roderikus 3 Years · 56 comments

damankas said:
"The problem is, that is not accepted by the medical community and it won't be for quite some time," said Dr. Steven LeBoeuf, co-founder of biometrics firm Valencell. "The [FDA] would have to approve it and then doctors have to accept it, and then they need to get reimbursed for it. That's a long process. It's not as straightforward as one would think."
The FDA gave their stamp of approval for the ECG feature arguably a much more advanced feature than the other features used on the watch. I’m confused. Does this Dr. Steven LeBoeuf know this or did he assume that is wasn’t already approved 🤨

That confusion is because👨‍⚕️won’t explain us the difference between a health device and a health indicative device.
There’s little or no urgency for approval of  devices by Medical Authorisation Authorities around the globe.
The medical world considers self-medication a pretty bad idea - as it would deny their own medical expertise and come at cost of the significance of themselves

GeorgeBMac 8 Years · 11421 comments

damankas said:
"The problem is, that is not accepted by the medical community and it won't be for quite some time," said Dr. Steven LeBoeuf, co-founder of biometrics firm Valencell. "The [FDA] would have to approve it and then doctors have to accept it, and then they need to get reimbursed for it. That's a long process. It's not as straightforward as one would think."
The FDA gave their stamp of approval for the ECG feature arguably a much more advanced feature than the other features used on the watch. I’m confused. Does this Dr. Steven LeBoeuf know this or did he assume that is wasn’t already approved ߤ覬t;/span>

No, he is correct.  FDA approval only means Apple can sell it, not that a doctor needs to accept it.
The scenario would be: 

Patient:  Hello? I need to see the doctor because my Apple Watch said I have A-Fib.
Secretary:   OK, we can give you an appointment (2 weeks or more away of course!)
Doctor:  (2 weeks later) I see!  Well, make an appointment with a lab to have an EKG done.  We'll let you know what it says

A patient reporting "My watch said...." would be taken no differently than the same patient saying "My arm hurts..."   Each is simply a patient report to be evaluated.

As for the Apple Watch, no physician will ever take it as the final word.   They have no way of validating the results because there are too many variables.

-----------------------------------------------------
But, the Apple Watch is already making one big difference in medicine:  A-Fib has historically only been diagnosed when a patient complains of things like shortness of breath or a physician notices an irregular heartbeat.   As Dr. Reifell of the Apple Watch based Heartline Study points out:
" Since the turn of the century, we've used ECG to diagnose A-Fib.  Given the sporadic nature of A-Fib, using ECGs when a patient presents with an irregular pulse is almost diagnosis by coincidence.   Now we can bring ECGs to the patient with implanted and wearable devices like pacemakers, insertable monitors, and the Apple Watch"

At the very least, the Apple Watch can trigger a closer look by a physician who could order a Holter Monitor where data is conflicting.