Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

EU will force Apple & Google to allow third-party app stores, payment services

European Commission member wants Apple to allow alternate App Stores

Last updated

The European Union has published its full Digital Markets Act, which sets out to require firms such as Apple to offer alternatives to its App Store, and payment systems.

Following its plans to require Apple Messages, and others, to work with smaller competitors, the EU has now released full details of its Digital Markets Act (DMA). The DMA was agreed upon during an almost eight-hour talk between the EU's Parliament, Council, and Commission, on March 24, 2022.

According to EU's antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, the process from this agreement to enacting the proposals into law is going to be "really, really fast." She expects the legislation to be enacted and "coming into force sometime in October."

"A fair marketplace is part of every democracy," continued Vestager in a speech, "and the steps that we took last night, well, they are huge steps in terms of securing every business and [making sure] that the digital marketplace is fair for the benefit of every consumer."

"For example, a new interoperability obligation between messaging services that has been added," she said, "as well as a ban of data collection for the purpose of targeted advertising, unless there is effective consent."

Certain obligations are not yet fully determined, for example the messaging interoperability requirements. The EU's statement said it was agreed that these "will be assessed in the future."

Most significantly for companies such as Apple and Google, Article 6.1(c) of the DMA would require iPhones to be opened up to sideloading of apps — including third-party app stores — and all providers will have to support alternative payment systems. Customers will also have the right to uninstall any preloaded apps.

Additionally, firms defined as "gatekeepers" will have to cease the preferential treatment of their own services on platforms that they control.

EU's aims with the DMA

Vestager listed the many antitrust cases the EU has either concluded with the likes of Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook, or is currently involved in.

"The thing is that what we have learned over these years is that we can correct in specific cases, we can punish illegal behaviour," she said. "But when things become systemic, well then we need regulation as well. Because if there is a systemic risk behaviour, if there are entrenched positions, then we need regulation to come in."

Vestager also said that the DMA will bring technology companies into line with other industries that have similarly required oversight and regulation.

"Actually it's quite similar to what has been done a long time ago," she said. "In banking, in telecoms in energy in transport, where regulation and competition works hand in hand. At long last, we established the same reality here."

Only large companies that the DMA describes as providing "core platform services," will be designated as "gatekeepers," and be subject to the provisions of the act if it passes into law.

According to the European Parliament, a gatekeeper has to provide browsers, messaging services, or social media, and have at least 45 million monthly end users in the EU. They must also have 10,000 annual business users, and a market cap of at least 75 billion euros ($82 billion), or annual turnover of 7.5 billion euros ($8.2 billion).

The full legal text of the DMA has to be finalized before approval. While Vestager said that she was hoping for October, given typical timetables, a 2023 enactment is more likely. Both the EU Parliament and Council are responsible for final approval.



132 Comments

darelrex 12 Years · 140 comments

The biggest (and largely unspoken in this debate) problem with sideloading is that it's a portal for mass, casual piracy of third-party apps, especially mom-and-pop apps that don't depend on host servers. (That's why Epic Games is fine with this; their best products are server-dependent, hence already piracy-proof.) Then, small-time app developers — the very ones the legislation is allegedly crafted to protect — see 80-90% of their revenue disappear. That's what happens on Android, now it will happen on iPhone/iPad too?

And fines pegged on global revenue, not revenue in the EU? So even if Apple scaled back its business in the EU, it wouldn't make any difference?
And would Apple really be able to contain these changes to the EU, with no impact on its non-EU business worldwide (malware; devs pretending to be EU, etc.)?

Please, please, Apple, have the guts to just say no, and withdraw from the EU. Yes, that will suck, and a lot of people will hate you for it (if they don't already), but if the alternative is to let clueless lawmakers irreversibly gut your best products, forcing you offer just another, me-too, Android POS, then maybe it's finally time to take a stand. Exit their market, refuse to pay the giga-fines they lob at you on the way out, and let the people of the EU take some time deciding if their competition police are really helping them or not.

17 Likes · 0 Dislikes
bshank 8 Years · 257 comments

I can hear Daniel Ek singing to his “EU Taking Over da World” Spotify playlist, Who Let the Dogs Out in the shower right now

TheObannonFile 8 Years · 113 comments

Can’t this be handled with flick of a switch to make everyone happy? Have a setting in Settings > App Store “Allow Sideloading”. Have it switched off by default.  If a user switches it on, they can side load. Everyone wins, and nobody is forced to do something they don’t want to.

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
davgreg 10 Years · 1053 comments

As long as I can opt out of third party nonsense I really do not care.
If they intend to make us allow that crap on our phones…

DAalseth 7 Years · 3123 comments

Can’t this be handled with flick of a switch to make everyone happy? Have a setting in Settings > App Store “Allow Sideloading”. Have it switched off by default.  If a user switches it on, they can side load. Everyone wins, and nobody is forced to do something they don’t want to.

In theory it could be. The trouble is, as I'm sure I've mentioned before, is that there will be a rush for the exits. A lot of the apps that we need from MS, Adobe, and such, will immediately exit the AppStore for their own company stores so they can keep that 30%. Companies will appear overnight offering to host  apps for 10% commission, so even a lot of small time developers will feel the urge to leave the AppStore.  The result will be that even if some of us don't want to leave the Walled Garden, we will have no choice. We will all have to flip the switch, set up an account, give them our credit card info, and cross our fingers. We will all have to allow side loading. 

Whether this will be good or bad I'm not going to get into. I'm just pointing out that once this Rubicon is crossed, it will be a very different world we are operating in.

8 Likes · 0 Dislikes