Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple has become a lobbying powerhouse amid growing antitrust scrutiny

Credit: Laurenz Heymann/Unsplash

Apple is now spending more than it has ever on political lobbying in the era of antitrust scrutiny from all directions, including in the U.S.

The iPhone maker spent a record $4.6 million in the first half of 2022, according to a new Bloomberg report tracking how Apple CEO Tim Cook has become one of the most politically active tech chief executives in the country.

Apple's spending was $1.5 million higher in the first half of 2022 than in 2021.

Since the beginning of 2021, Apple has also registered three new lobbying organizations that have ties to key lawmakers in the antitrust realm. The Cupertino company is also tapping lobbyists directly from Capitol Hill — including a former aide to Sen. Amy Klobuchar.

Apple's number of both in-house and outside lobbyists has increased more than 65% since 2015. Interestingly, Apple's total pool of lobbyists is still smaller than its competitors.

The report also details some of the tactics that Apple lobbyists have tried. Back in 2021, for example, lobbyists tied to Apple attempted to stir up a political battle between the House Judiciary Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee. That attempt was ultimately unsuccessful.

Lobbying has increased across the technology industry amid rising antitrust tensions. Lawmakers in the U.S., for example, are considering new legislation that could force Apple to allow third-party app stores, side-loading, and alternate payment mechanisms.

Other lobbying attempts have worked out, however. The American Choice and Innovation Act, an antitrust measure in the Senate, was revised to make it easier for companies to fend off allegations of anti-competitive practices. Bloomberg reports that Apple lobbyists "pushed hard" for that change.

Although once a CEO hesitant to use his star power for political purposes, Cook now is reportedly a frequent visitor to Capitol Hill, and meets or phones regularly with lawmakers. Cook has advocated for Apple to be treated differently, since its business model doesn't rely on harvesting user data.

Other lobbyists have also taken notice. One lobbyist for the company that makes ProtonMail told Bloomberg that "[w]herever we turn our heads, we find out Apple was also there, making their side of the argument."



12 Comments

avon b7 20 Years · 8048 comments

"Cook has advocated for Apple to be treated differently, since its business model doesn't rely on harvesting user data."

If, by chance, he chose the same line of wording, I'm sure he would have said 'treated different' 

:) 

chadbag 13 Years · 2029 comments

tyler82 said:
If you can’t beam em, bribe em.

Not sure why you think this has anything to do with bribes.  


Lobbying is valid and lawful advocacy to lawmakers.  The same as you calling your senator or rep and asking them to support or oppose something you want them to. 

Lobbyists for firms (outside of legal officers etc) need to be registered as such to keep it all on the up and up.  


rob53 13 Years · 3315 comments

Unfortunately, lobbying is needed because politicians who make money on legal bribes from a company have to be challenged by lobbyists supporting the other company being attacked. It would be nice if politicians didn't play favorites but they do. Every country has an ulterior motive for everything they do. Rarely is it actually based on laws.

fred1 11 Years · 1134 comments

chadbag said:
tyler82 said:
If you can’t beam em, bribe em.
Not sure why you think this has anything to do with bribes.  
Lobbying is valid and lawful advocacy to lawmakers.  The same as you calling your senator or rep and asking them to support or oppose something you want them to. 

Lobbyists for firms (outside of legal officers etc) need to be registered as such to keep it all on the up and up.  


Yea, you go on believing that, together with thinking that it’s a democracy, where politicians only decide based on what their constituents want.