Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Big tech antitrust bill in danger after lobbyist spending spree

US Capitol. Credit: Alejandro Barba

Last updated

Apple, Google, and others have spent $95 million lobbying against a bill that would prevent them from favoring their own services, and between that and the schedule, a vote seems unlikely.

Big Tech firms have been lobbying against the American Choice and Innovation Act since 2021. It's also been subject to delays as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has been waiting to put the bill to a vote until there is sufficient support.

Now according to Bloomberg, it's a risk of failing because there is so little time left to pass major legislation before the midterms. This is the same problem that it faced before the August recess, but now the Senate is planning to be in session for just two weeks in October before the elections.

The bill would require 60 votes to pass and be sent to the House. It has 13 co-sponsors in the Senate. Since it is a bipartisan bill, some believe that if time were taken to put it to a vote, there would be sufficient support from the currently undecided.

"Once this bill comes to the floor for a vote, we are confident it will pass," said Minnesota Democrat Amy Klobuchar, who introduced the bill with Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley.

There are opponents of the bill within government, including Californian Republican Kevin McCarthy. But if the bill is not voted on in this session, it will have failed and will not return in its current form.

Apple, Google, Amazon, and Meta reportedly spent almost $95 million in lobbying efforts against the bill. The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) — a group that has Amazon, Google, and Facebook as members — says voters are not interested.

"I don't see it going to the floor," said Michael Petricone of the CTA. "With an election coming up, I expect senators to come back and focus on issues that are popular with voters. Tech regulation is not one of those issues."

Big Tech lobbyists argue that the bill's constraints would impact privacy.

However, Bloomberg reports that they are also concerned about how antitrust reform would work under a future GOP majority in the House. Such a majority would likely mean a focus on the allegation that online platforms limit conservative viewpoints.



11 Comments

omasou 7 Years · 645 comments

$95M  :o  That's an obscene amount of money! I could throw money out of a car window while driving from across the county and still have money left when I arrived.

It just shows how the entire political system is broken.

badmonk 11 Years · 1336 comments

On the other hand, what are the technology concerns that real Americans have?

These include- monopoly control of your neighborhood internet ISP, the cost of cellular contracts and the poor service, the epidemic of online scams that especially target the elderly, the loss or privacy, misinformation etc etc.

I also think the proponents of the bill are responding to moneyed interests as well.

larryjw 9 Years · 1036 comments

I'm not against the idea of anti-trust applied to the tech industry, but I've read this very short anti-trust proposal, and its simply a piece of crap. 

Nobody could lobby me to vote in favor of this bill, and you could give me a million dollars and I still wouldn't vote in favor of it.

The political system certainly is broken in many ways, and one way is these morons in Congress have no idea what a good law looks like and don't seem to care. The bill, like their campaigns, is a word salad. 

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

larryjw said:
I'm not against the idea of anti-trust applied to the tech industry, but I've read this very short anti-trust proposal, and its simply a piece of crap. 

Nobody could lobby me to vote in favor of this bill, and you could give me a million dollars and I still wouldn't vote in favor of it.

The political system certainly is broken in many ways, and one way is these morons in Congress have no idea what a good law looks like and don't seem to care. The bill, like their campaigns, is a word salad. 

Yes, and where is Net Neutrality these days, once the cause du jour of the anti-trust crowd here? The current progressive administration has had two years to reinstate it and nothing so far. And what happened to all the dire predictions of small operators being thrown off the internet because of big guys paying for traffic priority? What about all the throttling that was going to happen to those who couldn’t pay? Now comes the next cause celebre, tech giants pushing their own apps, oh the horror!

Then there is a recent article in the NYT warning politicians they may want to take it slow on domestic tech lest they go too far and damage their ability to compete globally against the Chinese and Koreans. But the “Too big so break it up, kill it” Elizabeth Warren mentality persists.

foregoneconclusion 12 Years · 2857 comments

lkrupp said:
larryjw said:
I'm not against the idea of anti-trust applied to the tech industry, but I've read this very short anti-trust proposal, and its simply a piece of crap. 

Nobody could lobby me to vote in favor of this bill, and you could give me a million dollars and I still wouldn't vote in favor of it.

The political system certainly is broken in many ways, and one way is these morons in Congress have no idea what a good law looks like and don't seem to care. The bill, like their campaigns, is a word salad. 
Yes, and where is Net Neutrality these days, once the cause du jour of the anti-trust crowd here? The current progressive administration has had two years to reinstate it and nothing so far. 

FYI:

"While the bill is narrow, what it does is important: it prevents the FCC from reclassifying broadband internet services again in the future. The bill stops the back and forth we’ve experienced, with one FCC instating net neutrality rules, only for another to strip away those protections. By deciding with a congressional mandate that broadband internet services fall firmly under Title II, the American public will have clarity on what the FCC can do, what users’ protections are, and who they can go to when ISPs cause harm."
 
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/08/new-proposal-brings-us-step-closer-net-neutrality