Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple protests criticism that it's not complying with EU laws

Apple claims that it is in compliance with EU DMA

Last updated

Apple has told an official hearing of the European Commission that it has fully complied with the new Digital Markets Act, despite complaints from rivals.

Now that the Digital Markets Act is fully in force in the European Union, EU regulators have the power to investigate compliance and, if necessary, fine Big Tech companies who are in breach of the new laws. In a hearing at the European Commission, Apple has been putting its position and refuting criticisms from rivals.

According to Reuters, the European Commission's hearing was a day-long event that featured Apple alongside rivals as well as app developers and business users. Apple's lawyer Kyle Andeer told the EC hearing that the company had redesigned its systems specifically to comply with the Digital Markets Act.

"We were guided first and foremost by ensuring that we've complied with the law," Andeer told the hearing. "And then second, that we did it in a way that was consistent with our values and consistent with the language that we've developed with our users over a very long period of time."

"And we think we've accomplished that," he continued. "I think we're focused on it from a user perspective."

"Now, it's not to say that we're not focused on the impact of developers, but I think from our perspective first and foremost," said Andeer, "we'll be tracking very carefully what's the impact of all of these different changes on the user experience that we've delivered to our customers for 15, 16 years through the iPhone?"

The DMA was created to regulate Big Tech firms, not just Apple. This hearing regarding Apple will be followed by daily separate ones for Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, ByteDance, and concluding with Microsoft on Tuesday March 26.

Apple has previously claimed that it worked closely with the EU throughout its development of new rules for rivals. It has nonetheless also updated its rules following recent developer concern.

It's also reversed its position on Epic Games. After Epic Games failed to convince Apple that it wouldn't break its contract again, Apple refused the games firm a developer license.

There was then a direct question from the EU over this decision, plus a DMA architect calling Apple's move "weird," and saying it seemed to want to be fined. This was followed very quickly by Apple reinstating Epic Games as a developer in Europe.

What happens next

The EU has not published a specific schedule beyond dates for hearings regarding each of the Big Tech firms that its DMA law covers. Regardless of whether these hearings lead to specific action, the EU is bound to continually monitor Apple and the others.

It is also bound to respond to complaints, and it seems inevitable that rivals such as Spotify wlll continue calling for Apple to be re-investigated. This is therefore just the earliest of days in which Apple will be in court over EU complance.



17 Comments

teejay2012 12 Years · 410 comments

The EU Commission is 'bound' to hear all complaints... thereby ensuring that they will be employed forever, as the complaints from the Ek's and Sweeney's will be just that.. forever. Frankly the bureaucracy that has become the EU is mind boggling.

avon b7 20 Years · 8046 comments

The EU Commission is 'bound' to hear all complaints... thereby ensuring that they will be employed forever, as the complaints from the Ek's and Sweeney's will be just that.. forever. Frankly the bureaucracy that has become the EU is mind boggling.

If you've read through the text of the DSA/DMA you would quickly realise that sitting back and doing nothing to reign in the control gatekeepers would be mind boggling. 

Spotify, and literally anybody, can file complaints. Some of them may lead to formal investigations.

As for compliance, well, as we can see from this process, that is yet to be determined, which in itself, blows a huge hole in the arguments of some people who insisted that Apple had complied simply because the 7th March had gone by without protests from the EU. 

The comments stated here from Apple legal are standard fare with claims of values (which are never detailed) and compliance but followed up with pure fluff like the consumer experience etc.

As I've said a few times already. We just have to wait and see now. 

tmay 11 Years · 6456 comments

Comments wrt to DMA compliancy workshop;

https://twitter.com/KayJebelli/status/1769635526062043315

Big day today as the Commission kicks off its second round of #DMA compliance workshops , this time focused on specific gatekeepers, their compliance reports, and the feedback of third-parties. First target: Apple


After reading that, and various other commentators such as Steve Sinofsky, who have the background and knowledge of regulatory enforcement, I have sided with the 

...DMA is going to be a shitstorm for consumers...

but sure, great for Spotify, Epic, et al.

YMMV

AllM 1 Year · 71 comments

avon b7 said:
The EU Commission is 'bound' to hear all complaints... thereby ensuring that they will be employed forever, as the complaints from the Ek's and Sweeney's will be just that.. forever. Frankly the bureaucracy that has become the EU is mind boggling.
If you've read through the text of the DSA/DMA you would quickly realise that sitting back and doing nothing to reign in the control gatekeepers would be mind boggling. 

Spotify, and literally anybody, can file complaints. Some of them may lead to formal investigations.

As for compliance, well, as we can see from this process, that is yet to be determined, which in itself, blows a huge hole in the arguments of some people who insisted that Apple had complied simply because the 7th March had gone by without protests from the EU. 

The comments stated here from Apple legal are standard fare with claims of values (which are never detailed) and compliance but followed up with pure fluff like the consumer experience etc.

As I've said a few times already. We just have to wait and see now. 

I still don’t understand why you keep stickin’ up for them politicians. They are mostly shortsighted, technologically illiterate, and only ever care about lining their pockets. 

avon b7 20 Years · 8046 comments

AllM said:
avon b7 said:
The EU Commission is 'bound' to hear all complaints... thereby ensuring that they will be employed forever, as the complaints from the Ek's and Sweeney's will be just that.. forever. Frankly the bureaucracy that has become the EU is mind boggling.
If you've read through the text of the DSA/DMA you would quickly realise that sitting back and doing nothing to reign in the control gatekeepers would be mind boggling. 

Spotify, and literally anybody, can file complaints. Some of them may lead to formal investigations.

As for compliance, well, as we can see from this process, that is yet to be determined, which in itself, blows a huge hole in the arguments of some people who insisted that Apple had complied simply because the 7th March had gone by without protests from the EU. 

The comments stated here from Apple legal are standard fare with claims of values (which are never detailed) and compliance but followed up with pure fluff like the consumer experience etc.

As I've said a few times already. We just have to wait and see now. 
I still don’t understand why you keep stickin’ up for them politicians. They are mostly shortsighted, technologically illiterate, and only ever care about lining their pockets. 

I don't stick up for anyone. LOL. 

I can be very critical of policitians like, for example, anyone involved with Brexit, or those doing nothing to clean up UK rivers, or even my local policitians who once shut down a local welfare centre providing free meals to the needy during the month of August arguing there wasn't enough in the budget to cover operating costs while at the same time spending a quarter of a million euros on some sculptures for the beach. 

There are good and bad politicians. There are good and bad decisions but, mostly, the EU has worked to benefit its citizens. The results are visible. 

I'm writing this from a train sitting next to a giant sign explaining how much EU money was used to install an ATP system on my stretch of line. The air I breathe is cleaner thanks to EU regulations. I will be taking in a Rowenta heater (now in its third year) for repair under warranty next week. The parts needed for that repair will be available for at least 10 years. All thanks to the EU. For this heater in particular, parts will be available for 15 years. 

If it ever needs to be repaired again and out of warranty the price has to be fair (again, thanks to the EU). Today that is a 26€ repair if I choose to go for a flat fee repair. 

Last year I had to go for an emergency consultation on what turned out to be a torn retina. I ended up with argon laser shots to shore things up. All free. 

The seawater that I swim in is tested daily and reports are posted weekly on display boards at the beach. Those are EU regulations. 

I have micro, mini, temporary and fixed green points available to me for recycling e-waste (or any other waste that isn't organic, paper, glass, plastic...) . If I buy a large electrical appliance, the seller has to take the old one away if I have no other plans for it. All for free. 

They are all the result of political decisions. 

Most of the EU directives impacting Apple have been around for years. The DMA/DSA are simply efforts to bring legislation into line with current reality. 

There is another big directive in the pipe concerning how long products should last but Apple can take a breather here. The first industry to be impacted by that will be the textile industry.