Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple ceases iPhone 14, third-gen iPhone SE sales in the EU

iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus

Last updated

Apple has pulled the iPhone 14 and the third-gen iPhone SE from its online Apple Store in a number of EU countries, all to abide by inbound charger regulations.

Earlier in December, it was rumored that Apple would discontinue sales of the iPhone 14 generation of devices, as well as the current iPhone SE, in the European Union by the end of 2024. Two weeks later, it has become a reality.

The online version of the Apple Store covering many EU territories now do not list the iPhone 14 nor the iPhone SE. The top menu for the iPhone section of the regional Apple website now has nothing between the iPhone 15 and the Compare options in affected countries, skipping over where the iPhone 14 and SE used to exist.

The list of affected countries checked by AppleInsider includes France, Germany, Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden, as well as others within the bloc. While the UK isn't affected and still lists the models, Ireland does not.

Apple has not provided an official explanation for the removals of the models, but it is widely believed that the change is due to regulations set to become active at the start of 2025.

In October 2022, ministers of the EU Council finalized approvals for the common charger directive, which would require smartphones, tablets, and headphones to be sold equipped with USB-C ports in 2024. The aims of the directive are to make it easier for consumers to get the right charger for their hardware, and to minimize e-waste.

By pulling sales of Lightning-equipped models late in the year, Apple therefore abides by the directive in the affected countries, just in time for the end of the year.

Not an entire block

The regulation doesn't forbid the sale of older smartphones designed before the mandate's existence, only those designed since its passing. In theory, this could mean Apple could legally sell older iPhone models with Lightning, without being affected by the law.

The rules also don't impact resellers, which will be able to continue selling the pulled models while they still have available stock. Sourcing new supplies of the models from Apple will not be allowed.

It also won't change anything in the second-hand market, either, as it will apply to the sale of new devices.

In other countries where the sales still continue, it may not necessarily be a factor for long. In October, the UK government was considering revising the adoption of the charger mandate.



14 Comments

hammeroftruth 17 Years · 1360 comments

Is this actually “better” for EU customers who do not want the latest Apple technology and are more
comfortable using the older technology because the barn door is already open and the horse got out years ago with lightning cables.

So the customer ends up paying more for tech that they do not want all in the name of compatibility with competitors that they never wanted in the first place. 

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
nubus 9 Years · 663 comments

Is this actually “better” for EU customers who do not want the latest Apple technology

We need to protect car resale values by keep selling leaded gas.
We need to keep milk cheap for families by not adding the cost of pasteurization.
Your argument has indeed been seen before.

 Apple signed an agreement with EU in 2009 (!) to switch to a common charger and reduce e-waste:  https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/memo_09_301

The fact that Apple didn't deliver is all on Apple. It would indeed have been better if Apple had delivered as promised.
Now we simply have to work our way through the mess Apple created by standing still.
This is btw. not limited to EU. California, India, Saudi Arabia, part of UK, Switzerland, Norway... the world is moving.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
command_f 15 Years · 429 comments

The whole 'USB-C connector for charging on everything' makes a lot of sense. I can travel with one charger and one cable to charge iPhone, iPad, earPods, MBP, camera (Canon), power bank, Kindle etc.

Change always comes with pain and that's what we're currently (!) seeing.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
avon b7 21 Years · 8082 comments

Is this actually “better” for EU customers who do not want the latest Apple technology and are more
comfortable using the older technology because the barn door is already open and the horse got out years ago with lightning cables.

So the customer ends up paying more for tech that they do not want all in the name of compatibility with competitors that they never wanted in the first place. 

It is absolutely better in general for EU consumers but if you read the EU impact assessments they make it crystal clear that no single solution will tick all the boxes.

That inevitably means that some situations for some consumers/manufacturers won't be ideal.

Those EU customers who don't want the latest Apple tech were going to be impacted anyway because Apple was already moving to USB-C. 

The EU has simply created a legal framework to move industry in the same 'harmonised' direction. 

And it's huge in scope so most people will be better off in the long run, especially as it covers far more than phones. 

Chrismas Eve saw a lot of guests at my place and some wanted to charge their iPhones but lightning cables aren't as common at home as USB-C so that is a situation that will improve over time.

Away from phones, lots of uncommon charging connectors will also probably disappear to be replaced by USB-C. 

thrang 18 Years · 1048 comments

avon b7 said:
Is this actually “better” for EU customers who do not want the latest Apple technology and are more
comfortable using the older technology because the barn door is already open and the horse got out years ago with lightning cables.

So the customer ends up paying more for tech that they do not want all in the name of compatibility with competitors that they never wanted in the first place. 

....The EU has simply created a legal framework to move industry in the same 'harmonised' direction. 

And it's huge in scope so most people will be better off in the long run, especially as it covers far more than phones....

Umm, so we really want the EU or other governments to start directing product development? Broadly, there may be technical, security, performance reasons (and more) for a company to prefer a particular technology that is considered non-standard. This was the reason Lighting was originally invented. 

I have no love to keep Lightning going, but that is not the point. When governments start to dictate the development of products either through mandates or fines, you are going down a slippery road that you will not like. 

For example, what if Apple or someone else invents a demonstrably better connector? Better than USB-C. More secure, faster, much greater bandwidth. Can they develop and introduce it? What if USB-C limits functionality for other endeavors a company envisions for its products?

Let the market decide, and let innovation guide.