Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple faces new lawsuit over iPhone concept

A little-known California company is suing Apple Inc. and satellite phone company Atlantic RT, Inc. for patent infringement after having just recently beat both firms to a new patent covering mobile entertainment and communications devices.

Los Angeles-based Minerva Industries, Inc. filed the patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas on Tuesday, just hours after having been granted United States Patent No. 7,321,783 entitled "Mobile Entertainment and Communication Device."

The 6-page formal complaint alleges that representatives from Minerva informed Apple of their pending application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering iPhone concepts back in November, but that Apple "waited until approximately one week before the patent was to issue before sending prior art" in an attempt to trump the filing with one of its own.

After subsequently examining both claims, however, the patent office definitively ruled in Minerva's favor, determining the claims within its application were patentable over Apple's prior art and all other art that had been submitted to the office.

"On information and belief, Apple monitored the progress of [Minerva's Application during the continued reexamination, and became aware on or about November 20, 2007 that the Patent Office rejected its contention that the Apple Prior Art rendered the claims of [Minerva's] Application invalid and had issued a notice of allowance," Minerva's attorneys at Russ August & Kabat wrote in the suit.

"As a result of these Defendants’ infringement of the ‘783 Patent, Minerva has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined, and will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Defendants’ infringing activities are enjoined by this Court."

Similarly, the complaint claims, Atlantic is also liable of infringement of the '783 Patent "by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, or selling mobile entertainment and communication devices covered by one or more claims of the ‘783 Patent, including without limitation the Thuraya SG-2520."

Minerva is seeking a permanent injunction enjoining Apple and AtlanticRT from further infringement, a judgment and order requiring both firms to pay damages, attorneys’ fees, as well as an award of enhanced damages due to the pair's "deliberate and willful" conduct.

Minerva on Tuesday also filed two additional suits of similar nature. One targets Research In Motion and Cricket Communications, while the other names 29 defendants, including AT&T Mobility, LG, Palm, Motorola, Nokia, Alltel, Dobson Cellular, Helio, HP, MetroPCS Wireless, Sprint Spectrum, Nextel, T-Mobile USA, Tracfone Wireless, Cellco Partnership, Virgin Mobile, HTC, Kyocera Wireless, Pantech Wireless, Sanyo, Sony Ericsson, and Samsung.



48 Comments

bergermeister 19 Years · 6559 comments

Yep. Right or wrong, them's the breaks.

Just for kicks, I went to the company's website... they seem to be only interested in patenting things and suing people but not producing any products... they could get a patent on the process...

http://www.gigatec.com/index.asp

The company profile starts off by saying they hold various patents, not what they try to do as a company.

In their press release, they call Apple's product the iphone; they can't even label it correctly: iPhone. Lame. Actually, their entire site is filled with grammatical errors. They can't be bothered to make a good presentation.

ajhill 17 Years · 81 comments

I'm going to put in an application for flying plug-in electric cars. That way when someone gets around to actually building the device I can sue their ass off.

You gotta love America. You can get rich suing anyone you want.

By the way I hold the patent on a mixture of 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen. I call it iAir and everyone on the planet Earth owes me royalties for BREATHING. If you don't want to pay up you can opt out by not breathing. Your choice.

The Lawyers have got to go...

age234 18 Years · 27 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergermeister

Just for kicks, I went to the company's website... they seem to be only interested in patenting things and suing people but not producing any products... they could get a patent on the process...

http://www.gigatec.com/index.asp

Impressive. Their website looks like it was made by Web Design 1996.

bergermeister 19 Years · 6559 comments

Their only product is a stupid drawing of an idea most any geek could have drawn up a few years ago about a dream device. They probably sat back, watched an episode of The Jetsons and decided to patent it. What's worse is the US patent system will actually go for crap like this.