Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple job listings suggest cameras coming to Apple TV, hinting at motion controls

Camera-equipped Apple TV concept via Brightcove.

Last updated

The Apple TV is one of the few products in Apple's lineup that doesn't include an integrated camera, but that may change with future versions of the hardware, according to new job listings from the company, potentially paving the way for gesture-based motion controls in the living room.

Mentions of camera support for Apple TV were discovered this week by AppleInsider in a handful of advertised available positions for Apple's Camera Software team. The listings reveal that the team builds capture and camera foundation across "all of Apple's innovative products," and goes on to include the currently camera-less Apple TV alongside camera-equipped devices like the iPhone and iPad.

Job titles include Camera Algorithms Developer, Camera Tuning Framework Engineer, Media System Performance Engineer. Qualified candidates must have experience working with camera capture frameworks.

Though Apple TV doesn't currently have a camera, Apple's purchase of PrimeSense has hinted to some that camera-driven motion controls could be in its future.Beyond Apple TV, the listings also make note that the Camera Software team works with platforms like OS X, which drives camera-equipped Mac hardware, as well as iTunes. While the inclusion of the latter may seem odd, Apple's iTunes software for both Mac and iOS features camera integration, allowing users to easily scan gift cards and for redemption on the company's digital storefronts.

Other recently advertised positions, such as an opening for a Camera Engineering Product Manager, make mention of iPhone, iPad, Mac and iPod, but do not include the Apple TV. Among recently advertised positions, only some make note of supposed Apple TV support.

While it's possible the mention of Apple TV for camera-related positions could just be boilerplate text for a job vacancy, there is a large amount of evidence that Apple is planning to improve upon its existing set-top box business, potentially with new hardware that could add camera-driven motion controls.

Perhaps most notable is the company's late 2013 acquisition of PrimeSense, an Israeli 3D sensor firm that was responsible for the technology behind Microsoft's first-generation Kinect motion controls for Xbox 360. Apple is said to have paid about $360 million in the deal.

In addition, PrimeSense's technology has also been used by Matterport's 3D full-color 3D scanner, as well as iRobot's Ava healthcare robot. In both cases, the firm's sensors are utilized to create a visual model of its environment, to be used by hardware in unique ways like navigation and human interaction.

Apple TV

Given the potential uses for PrimeSense, observers have speculated that the company's technology will power gesture controls on future HDTV-related products from Apple, whether they are in a new set-top box or a full-fledged television set.

The PrimeSense purchase followed a series of rumors in 2013 that suggested Apple is working on a new Apple TV model with enhanced control functionality. Specifically, one report said that although Apple had dabbled with voice controls for a new HDTV accessory, those plans had gone "out the window," in favor of "some new way to interact."

And in recent weeks, there have been numerous reports that an Apple TV update may be unveiled in the coming months. According to Bloomberg, the device could be unveiled as soon as April, but may not launch until this fall. A months-long wait between introduction and launch would likely mean a major shift for the platform, and potentially new opportunities for developers to create software.



55 Comments

ireland 17436 comments · 18 Years

All I personally want for Apple TV is a better and Bluetooth standard bundled Apple remote. The last thing I need is a camera, motion controls (with a likely added expense, too). And if they want to add games and an App Store it'll need larger storage size options with an Apple-designed games-specific hardware games controller. Because relying on a software app or third party to build your hardware games controller for your "now-it's-a-games-console" would be ridiculous! As for me, like I said, I just want an improved remote with perhaps two additional function buttons, a little bit of bulk for battery and comfort and Bluetooth technology to get around my coffee table. And people don't tell me the existing remote works fine for you. You don't blame the user. When was the last time my Playstation remote didn't recognise a remote input? Oh, that's right, never.

tallest skil 43086 comments · 14 Years

Why would it need to be so stupidly wide?

 

At least we’ve moved past the “integrated television” nonsense.

dcgoo 284 comments · 13 Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland 

All I personally want for Apple TV is a better and Bluetooth standard bundled Apple remote. The last thing I need is a camera, motion controls (with a likely added expense, too). 
I just want an improved remote with perhaps two additional function buttons, a little bit of bulk for battery and comfort and Bluetooth technology to get around my coffee table. 

 

An actual TV receiver would be kinda nice too.  

ireland 17436 comments · 18 Years

[quote name="Tallest Skil" url="/t/163590/apple-job-listings-suggest-cameras-coming-to-apple-tv-hinting-at-motion-controls#post_2485588"]Why would it need to be so stupidly wide? At least we’ve moved past the “integrated television” nonsense. [/quote] The only reason Apple can't do an integrated TV - which I'd personally love - is they cannot control the content. I think Apple should buy up the rights to all sports worldwide, they should produce their own shows ala Netflix and they should provide an alternative to Netflix monthly streaming via a monthly subscription. If they could do all that a reasonably monthly fee perhaps they could find a way to subsidise a large TV and provide the ultimate integrated experience. 'Cause the day I can get a true out-of-the-box-Apple-experience with one single product and remote in my living room controlling it all wirelessly is the day I can die a happy man. Throw in magnetically-charged remote that you can stick to the top of the TV that intelligently charges only when the battery is low, and while the TV is in sleep mode and I've died and gone to heaven.

tallest skil 43086 comments · 14 Years

Originally Posted by Ireland 
The only reason Apple can't do an integrated TV - which I'd personally love - is they cannot control the content.

 

Of course they can! It’s why they haven’t put a TV tuner in the Apple TV yet, and it’s why they never will. They literally DO control the content.

 
I think Apple should buy up the rights to all sports worldwide, they should produce their own shows ala Netflix and they should provide an alternative to Netflix monthly streaming via a monthly subscription.

 

Hmm. Wait, Netflix produces its own shows? I’d at least like Apple to contract individually with each channel. None of this “you MUST have all of our package channels” nonsense.