Neil Hughes
Details from Apple's supplier non-disclosure agreements are beginning to leak thanks to the bankruptcy proceedings of GT Advanced Technologies, with the sapphire maker arguing that even more should be published so creditors and shareholders can see the full story behind its fall from grace.
Court filings made by GT Advanced Technologies have already revealed that Apple imposes a $50 million penalty "per occurrence" for leaking any information about an upcoming, unannounced product. The fine was first reported on Monday by the Financial Times.
Even more could come to light as GT Advanced's bankruptcy proceedings carry on, as the company argued in court last week that even more information about its relationship with Apple should be published. The company also hinted that the terms of Apple's contract were unreasonable, referring to them as "oppressive and burdensome."
In the filing, GT Advanced noted that even the confidentiality agreement between the two companies is identified as "confidential." It has asked for permission to disclose the details of its agreement in the interest of creditors, equity holders and other stakeholders, as well as "to ensure an open, transparent and fair process."
GT Advanced entered into a $578 million deal with Apple a year ago for advanced sapphire supplies. The scratch-resistant material is used on the iPhone to protect the Touch ID fingerprint sensor as well as the rear camera lens, and it will also be found on two of three Apple Watch models next year.
The sapphire maker announced one week ago> that it had filed for bankruptcy — a move that came as a major surprise, even to Apple. GT Advanced plans to close its plants in both Arizona and Massachusetts, which could cost a total of 890 jobs, though Apple has said its focus is on preserving the jobs it helped create in Arizona.
Apple designed and built the facility in Mesa, Ariz., and was to lease it to GT Advanced, which would use it to manufacture sapphire for the iPhone, Apple Watch, and potentially other future products. The agreement was reached in cooperation with state officials, who awarded tax breaks in return for the creation of jobs.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
109 Comments
"In the filing, GT Advanced noted that even the confidentiality agreement between the two companies is identified as "confidential." It has asked for permission to disclose the details of its agreement in the interest of creditors, equity holders and other stakeholders, as well as "to ensure an open, transparent and fair process." And people get all up in arms about leaked parts from China? At least Chinese companies don't bitch about confidentiality agreements.
There is a point at which it should be said by any reasonable person, 'Apple, you have gone too far'. OK now for the flame. Go fellas !
Wah wah wah. If they thought the agreement was unfair, why did they sign it in the first place?
Before entering an agreement is when one should cry foul, not after you had the cake and ate it.
@prokip No Flame, just asking you to justify that statement, please give a argument to represent how you came to state that. Am genuinely interested in your opinion on it