Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Judge approves Apple's $450 million e-book settlement

Last updated

U.S. District Court Judge Denise Cote on Friday accepted Apple's $450 million proposal to settle a class action lawsuit regarding e-book price fixing leveled by 33 states and territories.

According to in-court reports from Reuters, Judge Cote characterized the agreement as "unusual" prior to accepting the settlement terms that will see Apple pay out $400 to a class of consumers as well as citizens of 33 U.S. states and territories represented by state attorneys general. The final tally could come out to as many as 23 million iBooks users.

Apple has been awaiting Judge Cote's ruling since July, when all parties agreed to the $450 million sum. The class initially aimed for an $840 million payout.

The settlement is contingent on Apple's appeal of a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that found the company culpable of colluding with five major book publishers to falsely inflate e-book prices in the iBookstore. The same court, run by Judge Cote, is currently overseeing class-action suit proceedings. Depending on the outcome, consumers may only recoup $50 million and lawyers $20 million — or nothing if Apple goes back to trial and is found not guilty of breaking antitrust laws — as stated in the settlement's terms.

During today's hearing, Judge Cote called the agreement an "unusually structured settlement, especially for one arrived at on the eve of trial." However, the jurist did understand why plaintiffs agreed to the deal, citing Apple's use of legal tactics meant to delay proceedings, the publication reports.

Apple was first investigated, then sued, by the U.S. Department of Justice for employing so-called "agency model" pricing, which operates on a "most favored nations" basis that restricts content owners from selling the same product to a another retailer at a lower price. The system countered e-book sector leader Amazon's "wholesale model" that allows retailers to buy content in bulk and set resale prices at or below cost.

After Judge Cote found Apple guilty of collusion, the company was slapped with an injunction that bars it from entering into similar deals with content owners.



52 Comments

john.b 16 Years · 2733 comments

In other book publisher news, Hachette and Amazon settled their dispute by agreeing to use the same agency model that got Apple sued.

bobbyfozz 11 Years · 96 comments

When Uncle Sam wants to get you, there is no justice. Since Apple's plan was just another legitimate way of doing business, and has been, where do Holder and Cote get off pre-judging Apple? Why didn't Apple go for a jury trial?

macmanfelix 12 Years · 125 comments

@bobbyfozz, the whole system is corrupt. It%u2019s so depressing/discouraging.

yoyo2222 14 Years · 144 comments

"In other book publisher news, Hachette and Amazon settled their dispute..."

 

Are you kidding me? Unbelievable!

 

So Amazon can do this with Hachette alone (at least so far) because Amazon wasn't cutting deals with multiple publishers? Or is the whole concept of Agency pricing anti-trust?

tallest skil 14 Years · 43086 comments

Originally Posted by yoyo2222 

Or is the whole concept of Agency pricing anti-trust?

 

No, it’s WAAAAAAA MOMMY THE BIG BAD APPLE IS COMPETING AGAINST US