Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Sen. Franken lauds Apple response detailing Face ID security

Last updated

Shortly after Apple introduced iPhone X with Face ID biometric security in September, U.S. Senator Al Franken challenged CEO Tim Cook to address the technology's potential impact on consumer privacy. Apple has since responded in a letter detailing the system's built-in security features.

As the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law, Franken expressed concern over Apple's facial recognition solution in a letter last month.

Alongside routine questions regarding the basic operation of Face ID, and the underlying TrueDepth camera system, the senator sought clarification on Apple's method of data handling. User privacy is a key concern for technology companies, which often collect sensitive information in a bid to better serve customers.

Beyond consumer privacy, Franken questioned Apple over steps taken to protect against racial, gender and age bias.

In its response, penned by VP for Public Policy Cynthia Hogan, Apple explained Face ID confirms the presence of an attentive face (via gaze detection), projects and reads a depth map of a user's face and sends that information to the Secure Enclave for processing. Face ID data, which includes a mathematical representation of a user's face, is encrypted and never leaves the device.

Data sent to the Secure Enclave is not sent to Apple or included in device backups. Further, 2D face images and corresponding depth map information captured for normal unlock operations are immediately discarded once the mathematical representation is calculated for comparison against an enrolled Face ID profile, Apple said.

Hogan's letter goes on to reiterate information provided to the public last month in a press release, Face ID security white paper, an Apple Support Document and remarks made during the onstage presentation of iPhone X. Apple attached copies of the white paper and support document to its letter.

Franken on Monday issued a statement regarding Apple's response.

"All the time, we learn about and actually experience new technologies and innovations that, just a few years back, were difficult to even imagine," said Sen. Franken. "While these developments are often great for families, businesses, and our economy, they also raise important questions about how we protect what I believe are among the most pressing issues facing consumers: privacy and security. I appreciate Apple's willingness to engage with my office on these issues, and I'm glad to see the steps that the company has taken to address consumer privacy and security concerns."

Franken adds that he intends to follow up with Apple to glean more information about how the company plans to protect customer Face ID data. It is unclear what supplementary information Apple can provide, as the company has already published a wealth of knowledge relating to Face ID and the underlying TrueDepth camera technology to its website.

Apple's response in full:



30 Comments

MplsP 8 Years · 4050 comments

While I'm sure there was at least an element of political show with Franken's initial questioning, given the instances of hidden data sharing with other devices, his concerns and questions were reasonable to ask. In general, Apple has repeatedly shown themselves to be above average in  terms of data and consumer privacy. I'm glad they're continuing this track.

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

Franken keeps going back to the Apple "well" again and again. Sooooooooo... just how much Apple stock does he own? 

http://freebeacon.com/politics/al-franken-criticizes-tom-price-holding-tobacco-stocks-he-owns-too/

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/contributors?cid=N00029016&cycle=2018

sflocal 16 Years · 6139 comments

Well, Franken got his 5 minutes of fame.

Hey AL... why the hell did you not question Samsung when they came out with their botched Facial Recognition feature?  Well?

shapetables 10 Years · 201 comments

sflocal said:
Well, Franken got his 5 minutes of fame.

Hey AL... why the hell did you not question Samsung when they came out with their botched Facial Recognition feature?  Well?

5 minutes huh? Senator Smalley would disagree...

https://youtu.be/xNx_gU57gQ4

Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

MplsP said:
...his concerns and questions were reasonable to ask.

I'd agree if all that information hadn't just been detailed at the event which he could watch at any time with nice animations explaining how it works. I like Franken and I wish the letter had simply read: