The total transaction, valued at approximately $7.4 billion or $9.50 per share net of Sunâs cash and debt, comes just weeks after Sun was reported to have turned down a bid of $9.40 per share from IBM, which subsequently withdrew its offer after Sun canceled its exclusive negotiating rights.
Oracle said it expects the acquisition to add at least 15 cents on a non-GAAP profit to its adjusted earnings in the first full year after the deal closes. It also estimates that Sun will contribute over $1.5 billion to its non-GAAP operating profit in the first year, increasing to over $2 billion in the second year.
"This would make the Sun acquisition more profitable in per share contribution in the first year than we had planned for the acquisitions of BEA, PeopleSoft and Siebel combined,â said Oracle President Safra Catz.
Oracle picks up two key Sun software assets — Java and Solaris — in the deal that will allow it to deliver a full suite of hardware and software systems unparalleled in the industry.
Oracle Fusion Middleware, the software maker's fastest growing business, is built on top of Sunâs Java language and software, meaning Oracle can now ensure continued innovation and investment in Java technology for the benefit of its customers. Meanwhile, the Solaris operating system is the leading platform for the Oracle database, Oracleâs largest business. With Solaris now part of its product portfolio, Oracle plans optimize the Oracle database for some of the operating system's unique, high-end features.
"Oracle will be the only company that can engineer an integrated system â applications to disk â where all the pieces fit and work together so customers do not have to do it themselves," said Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison. "Our customers benefit as their systems integration costs go down while system performance, reliability and security go up."
More specifically, Oracle will be free to more closely tie its software to Sun servers running Solaris, which power some of the most critical data centers in government and on Wall Street.
Sun's Board of Directors has unanimously approved the transaction. It is anticipated to close this summer, subject to Sun stockholder approval, certain regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
45 Comments
I think Oracle has a lot more to gain from acquiring Sun than IBM did. This is a better deal for Sun, as well, and there is a lot less potential for layoffs due to overlap in services/products.
The implications alone of Oracle owning Java are immense. They can have a vertically integrated business model in many areas now, which has certainly worked well for Apple.
I just hope they keep developing VirtualBox and keep it free!
Apparently Oracle has the most to lose if Sun goes under.
Although I'm not so sure about some of the comments made; IBM is also in a position to offer its customers completely integrated systems as well. They do make their own hardware and software as well.
I wonder what this means for the future of MySQL...
F.I.S.H. - Fully Integrated Software and Hardware
I wonder what this means for the future of MySQL...
My guess is that MySQL will be a lot better off under Oracle as a low-end intro DB kind of like SleepyCat.