In benchmark tests run by Computerworld, Apple's Safari browser claimed the top spot over Firefox, Opera, and Chrome. Google released a beta build of Chrome to the public on Tuesday.
The results showed that Safari slightly edged out Chrome, was nearly twice as fast as Firefox, and over ten times faster than Opera.
Computerworld's method of testing used the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark suite. The test was run three times for each browser in OS X 10.6 and the numbers were averaged.
According to November numbers by Net Applications, Internet Explorer commands 63.62 percent of the total browser market, followed by Firefox with 24.72, Safari with 4.36 percent, 3.93 percent for Chrome, and 2.31 percent for Opera.
"As you might expect, the speed of Google Chrome for Mac is something we're very proud of. If you have a Mac, try installing the beta and see how fast it launches - there's hardly even time for the icon in the dock to bounce!" the Chrome development team said on its official blog.
Google's Chrome Mac beta can be downloaded from Google's website, and weighs in at 17.6MB.The program requires Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) or later and only works on Intel-based Macs.
Graph courtesy of Computerworld
69 Comments
Oops! Back to the drawing board!
Still very impressive for a Beta.
I tested Safari, the latest WebKit nightly, and Chrome on Sunspider as well.
Safari beat Chrome easily. Wasn't all that close. And the latest WebKit nightly blew both right out of the water.
Which is also testament to how well Apple is doing in this area. Which also means that if your browser isn't running WebKit you're doing it wrong.
May not be faster, but doesn't hog memory like Safari does.
May not be faster, but doesn't hog memory like Safari does.
Memory usage != slowness, when you consider that a lot of stuff can be and IS cached for quick access. It's only worth complaining when a program doesn't USE the RAM you have to make the program faster.
Unused RAM is wasted RAM.
Still very impressive for a Beta.
I tested Safari, the latest WebKit nightly, and Chrome on Sunspider as well.
Safari beat Chrome easily. Wasn't all that close. And the latest WebKit nightly blew both right out of the water.
Which is also testament to how well Apple is doing in this area. Which also means that if your browser isn't running WebKit you're doing it wrong.
I ran the same tests, but also added a nightly build of Chromium to the mix. And as you said, Webkit does blow the other out of the water.
\t
Chromet 542.4ms +/- 4.4%
Chromium:549.2ms +/- 3.6%
Safari\t 537.6ms +/- 1.2%
Webkit: 450.8ms +/- 0.5%