The Japan Book Publishers Association, the Japan Magazine Publishers Association, The Electronic Book Publishers Association of Japan, and Digital Comic Association issued a joint press release Tuesday condemning Appleâs distribution of infringing content as âillegal,â The Wall Street Journal reports. The consortium said works by well-known Japanese authors Haruki Marakami and Keigo Higashino had been illegally scanned and then distributed via the App Store.
âThe associations we represent believe that Apple bears grave responsibility for this problem,â the statement read. According to the consortium, Apple's excuse that it is unable to check for copyrighted material during the App review process is "a wholly unconvincing explanation."
Apple's policy of removing pirated material when notified by a copyright holder mirrors Google's policy with YouTube videos. Viacom is suing Google for more than $1 billion over unauthorized copyrighted material posted to YouTube, the report noted. Google has defended itself by asserting that it obeys the law by removing offending material when notified, while Viacom argues that it should not have to monitor the site and send notices for infringing material.
The group of publishers is willing to give Apple a chance. In its press release, it asked to meet with Apple Japan to discuss how to address the problems. However, should Apple ignore the request, it will further provoke the ire of the publishers. âA failure to respond will be regarded as a lack of will on your part to take measures in a sincere manner,â the consortium warned.
As a foreign company facing off against local companies in the arena of digital distribution, Apple's efforts have been met with resistance. Tokyo-based conglomerate Sony inked several deals with newspapers and publishers for its e-reader content platform just prior to the iPad's launch there in May.
However, as the popularity of Apple's devices continues to grow in Japan, publishers have begun to take notice. The iPad got off to a "frenzied" start in Japan, with buyers camping out for days to purchase the device. The iPhone is dominating the Japanese smartphone market, while the iPod has seen continued success in the country.
Apple will increase the stakes for the Japan App Store early next year when it brings iAd to the country with the help of local partner The Dentsu Group.
42 Comments
If they're anyone other than Yukio Mishima, they don't count.
I remember when I first saw this stuff on the Apstore it was so obvious. I do not believe that the people involved in the app-review process were unaware of the copyright violation.
@Quadra
You can add Masamune Shirow to the "does count" list.
The whole "notify us and we'll remove it upon review" thing is really weak and unacceptable for corporations like Google and Apple (and eBay for that matter). Imagine if Walmart or any other retailer tried selling counterfeit Levis and DVDs, and just changed their store policy to "notify us of infringements, and we'll remove them upon review".
I remember when I first saw this stuff on the Apstore it was so obvious. I do not believe that the people involved in the app-review process were unaware of the copyright violation.
How obvious was it to you?
??
And how could they have checked if the company which brings the app into AppStore has or has not the rights to distribute these books?
So, please, tell us, how did you come to conclusion, that this was some kind of violation?
Tell us, by which review process could Apple have concluded that it was a violation? Is this process a part of the current review? What makes you "believe" that Apple knew about it?
Just because you thought that is unlikely that such famous authors will appear in App Store?
Maybe you believe and assume too much?
The whole "notify us and we'll remove it upon review" thing is really weak and unacceptable for corporations like Google and Apple (and eBay for that matter). Imagine if Walmart or any other retailer tried selling counterfeit Levis and DVDs, and just changed their store policy to "notify us of infringements, and we'll remove them upon review".
Agree with you. Apple (and YouTube) should make a requirement for a right to publish from a developer.