Antonio Perez made the comments in an interview in New York on Thursday, adding that his company "deserves to win," as noted by Bloomberg. The International Trade Commission is scheduled to announce Friday whether it will review an ITC judge's earlier ruling that Apple and RIM are not in violation of the company's image-preview patents.
Update: The ITC revealed Friday that it will review the judge's decision, reopening the patent case between Apple and Kodak.
âThis is a lot of money, big money,â Perez said of a potential settlement. Kodak has received close to $1 billion from Korean electronics giants Samsung and LG in a settlement related to the same patent that Apple and RIM are accused of violating. According to the report, a different ITC judge sided with Kodak in the Samsung and LG cases, leading the phonemakers to settle before the full six-member commission could rule on the case.
Though the ITC Is unable to order monetary damages, it has the authority to block imports of products that are found to infringe upon U.S. patents. As such, the threat of an import ban often motivates companies to settle.
Rochester, N.Y.-based Kodak sued Apple in January of last year, alleging that the iPhone had infringed on patents relating to low resolution image previews. Several months later, Apple fired back with a countersuit over several digital imaging patents allegedly being violated by Kodak cameras.
In January of this year, an ITC judge ruled in favor of Apple and RIM, who had argued that the patent was invalid because it was an "obvious variation of an earlier invention."
Kodak's position in the case may have devolved into desperation. Two of the company's three main businesses lost money last year as revenues fell to $7.2 billion, compared to nearly half that amount in 2005. In the past year, Kodak has lost almost half of its market value.
Faced with the decline of the camera film market, Kodak has turned to its extensive patent portfolio as a source of income. Kodak licenses its digital imaging technology to about 30 companies, including handset makers such as LG, Motorola, Nokia and Sony Ericsson.
57 Comments
Last gasps of a dying company.
Kodak, take a picture of yourself, it might last longer than your companies business model will.
Do the shareholders really want this company to be remembered as the Pictures company akin to Darl's McBride and the SCO Group?
Fire this guy and get talent to restructure your future with your current IP. Invest heavily into R&D and streamline your focus on how your research can bring new IP to the market.
Otherwise, sell it off.
What could this sentence mean?
"Two of the company's three main businesses lost money last year as revenues fell to $7.2 billion, compared to nearly half that amount in 2005."
So they doubled their revenue since 2005? That can't be right, but that's how I read it.
Don't be so hard on Kodak. I don't know the specifics of their claims, but they've certainly innovated in the photographic department. It's not like they're some obscure company suing Apple for double-clicks or something. Suppose someone else comes and rips off key elements of the iPhone/iPad. Will people then suggest Apple needs to "streamline focus" and "restructure their future"? I bet everyone here will say how Apple needs to protect their IP...