Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

DOJ probes Apple's interest in Nortel patents

The U.S. Department of Justice is concerned about potential bids from Apple for a cache of patents being sold by Canadian telecom company Nortel, given the iPhone maker's legal track record.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the Justice Department is investigating companies interested in bidding on a collection of more than 6,000 patents from the now bankrupt Nortel including valuable intellectual property related to the 4G LTE standard.

The agency fears that U.S. technology giants, such as Apple and Google, could leverage the patents to block competition in the high-tech and wireless industries. According to people familiar with the matter, the DOJ hasn't found "major competitive issues" with Google, which has set the opening bid for the patents. However, officials reportedly have "greater concerns" about Apple. Sources said the company has been in talks with the Justice Department to address its concerns.

One legal expert called the trove "a stockpile of nuclear weapons as far as patents go." The auction is set to begin on June 20.

Late last year, Apple, Google, Nokia and Research in Motion were named as likely bidders on the patents. In April, Google's 900 million bid was accepted as a 'stalking-horse' offer.

“Google is a relatively young company, and although we have a growing number of patents, many of our competitors have larger portfolios given their longer histories,” Google general counsel Kent Walker said in April. “So after a lot of thought, we’ve decided to bid for Nortel’s patent portfolio in the company’s bankruptcy auction."

RIM has reportedly seriously considered topping Google's bid. Co-CEO Mike Lazaridis has called Nortel's LTE patents a "national treasure" in the past. It has also been suggested that a group of technology companies, which could include RIM, may pool their resources to outbid Google.

The Nortel situation has drawn comparisons to regulatory reaction earlier this year to a consortium of companies looking to acquire patents from Novell. Apple, Microsoft, Oracle and EMC created a joint holdings company to purchase 882 Novell patents after the company was acquired by Attachmate.

However, the deal prompted criticism from open source advocates worried that the companies would use the patents to damage open source competitors. In April, the Justice Department forced the consortium to promise not to use the Novell portfolio to unfairly stifle competition. Microsoft was also required to license patents instead of buying them.



99 Comments

magicj 15 Years · 406 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider

According to people familiar with the matter, the DOJ hasn't found "major competitive issues" with Google, which has set the opening bid for the patents. However, reviewers reportedly have "greater concerns" about Apple.

Top Contributors To Obama, 2008

University of California\t$1,591,395
Goldman Sachs\t$994,795
Harvard University\t$854,747
Microsoft Corp\t$833,617
Google Inc\t$803,436
Citigroup Inc\t$701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co\t$695,132
Time Warner\t$590,084
Sidley Austin LLP\t$588,598
Stanford University\t$586,557
National Amusements Inc\t$551,683
UBS AG\t$543,219
Wilmerhale Llp\t$542,618
Skadden, Arps et al\t$530,839
IBM Corp\t$528,822
Columbia University\t$528,302
Morgan Stanley\t$514,881
General Electric\t$499,130
US Government\t$494,820
Latham & Watkins\t$493,835
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/co...&cid=N00009638

cameronj 17 Years · 2355 comments

Yeah, really important that somebody innovative buys them... er....

splash-reverse 14 Years · 648 comments

Quote:
[...] given the iPhone maker's legal track record.

Sorry, could you be more specific and try to elaborate. If you mean them going to court defending their in-house portfolio, nothing's wrong with that. For bought IP, maybe...

mdriftmeyer 20 Years · 7395 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by magicj

Top Contributors To Obama, 2008
University of California\t$1,591,395
Goldman Sachs\t$994,795
Harvard University\t$854,747
Microsoft Corp\t$833,617
Google Inc\t$803,436
Citigroup Inc\t$701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co\t$695,132
Time Warner\t$590,084
Sidley Austin LLP\t$588,598
Stanford University\t$586,557
National Amusements Inc\t$551,683
UBS AG\t$543,219
Wilmerhale Llp\t$542,618
Skadden, Arps et al\t$530,839
IBM Corp\t$528,822
Columbia University\t$528,302
Morgan Stanley\t$514,881
General Electric\t$499,130
US Government\t$494,820
Latham & Watkins\t$493,835
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/co...&cid=N00009638

So what. Several of those top donors won't be there in 2012 because they won't like the necessity of streamlining the Military, redundant health services, and especially the need to raise taxes on the wealthy to balance the budget.