Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Samsung considering purchase of HP’s PC business - report [u]

Samsung is reportedly considering outsourcing notebook production to Taiwan-based OEMs, a move which sources attribute to the company’s unofficial interest in purchasing HP’s PC business [updated with Samsung response].

Update: Samsung said Wednesday that it has no intention of buying HP's PC business, as noted by MarketWatch.

DigiTimes reports that Samsung contacted Quanta Computer, Compal Electronics and Pegatron Technology in August to “evaluate the possibility of outsourcing notebook orders.” The South Korean company, which usually works with China-based notebook makers, is said to consider ordering a “small volume” of notebooks from these Taiwan-based companies in the future.

The same sources suggest that Samsung may make a move for HP’s PC business, although, considering the publication's hit and miss record, such rumors can not be verified at this point.

HP recently announced plans to cancel webOS hardware development as well as an interest in spinning off its PC business in order to focus on software instead. If Samsung were to take over HP’s PC business it would need to rely on Taiwan-based companies to build “HP’s 40 million units of PC orders in 2011.” Also important is the fact that PC orders from HP are "already set" for 2012 at least for Quanta.

Of those 40 million PCs, Quanta is said to be responsible for 20 million units with Foxconn Electronics, Inventec, Wistron and Compal expected to build eight million, seven million, 3-4 million and two million units, respectively. Samsung would also manufacture 10 million PC units of its own, which would bring the total number of shipped units close to 50-60 million per year, a number out of Samsung's reach. The company would therefore have to rely on OEM partners to meet that PC quota, Quanta reportedly believes.

According to a DisplaySearch report, Apple surpassed HP in the second quarter of 2011 to become the number one mobile PC vendor in the world. Apple shipped 13.6 million personal computers and iPads in Q2 compared to HP’s 9.7 million units sold during the same period. Samsung was not included in this list of top five mobile PC vendors compiled by DisplaySearch, which saw Dell, Acer and Lenovo occupy the third, fourth and fifth positions, behind Apple and HP.

Samsung, a long-time supplier for Apple, is becoming an important rival for the Cupertino-based company in the mobile business, thanks to its popular Android smartphone and tablet lines. Also worth mentioning are some of its current notebooks, specifically the Samsung Series 9 line, considered to be a Windows-based alternative to Apple’s MacBook Air models.

Apple is seeking to block Samsung in various patent infringement legal disputes in the USA and in other international markets, as a direct result of the growing rivalry between iOS devices, such as the iPhone and the iPad and their Android counterparts made by the South Korean company, namely Galaxy S smartphones and Galaxy Tab tablets.



26 Comments

smallwheels 14 Years · 584 comments

If Samsung bought HP's computer manufacturing division would they keep the HP name for the first batch of products that were already in the pipeline for HP? Would they decide to just change the faceplate name? The side of my HP computer has HP embossed on it and the front cover has a plastic logo molded into it. Those would be easy to change.

I wonder if Samsung would change the name of HP to something else that sounded more American or European. Would they dump all of the HP staff and just take over the physical plant items? It will be interesting to see what happens no matter who buys HP.

Does HP have really good patents that would help them sell computers over their competition?

I wish more large manufacturers would copy the Mac Mini only with more common sense. Why did Apple feel the best place for the card reader was on the back? It should be on the front with a couple of other USB ports so people could easily plug in thumb drives or recharge their phones.

kresh 19 Years · 372 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallwheels

Why did Apple feel the best place for the card reader was on the back? It should be on the front with a couple of other USB ports so people could easily plug in thumb drives or recharge their phones.

That would be a no-no, Apple relies on "form over function". Ports on the front would blow the ascetics!

smallwheels 14 Years · 584 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by kresh

That would be a no-no, Apple relies on "form over function". Ports on the front would blow the ascetics!

I wouldn't think an ascetic would use a computer. If one ever did it would probably be a used netbook. Ascetics probably wouldn't consent to be blown either. Just say'in.

nikon133 16 Years · 2600 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallwheels

If Samsung bought HP's computer manufacturing division would they keep the HP name for the first batch of products that were already in the pipeline for HP? Would they decide to just change the faceplate name? The side of my HP computer has HP embossed on it and the front cover has a plastic logo molded into it. Those would be easy to change.

I wonder if Samsung would change the name of HP to something else that sounded more American or European. Would they dump all of the HP staff and just take over the physical plant items? It will be interesting to see what happens no matter who buys HP.

Does HP have really good patents that would help them sell computers over their competition?

I wish more large manufacturers would copy the Mac Mini only with more common sense. Why did Apple feel the best place for the card reader was on the back? It should be on the front with a couple of other USB ports so people could easily plug in thumb drives or recharge their phones.

It is my understanding that HP is only outsourcing their manufacturing. Basically, instead of owning their own factories, they will contract OEMs to manufacture computers for them.

In HP's statement, they said they want to concentrate on research, development, design... rather than on manufacturing. Which should mean their name will remain on desktops and laptops.

It is also noted in that statement that HP has been outsourcing their manufacturing since 1995 or so. Even if they still have factories under their name, a lot of HP hardware is already being made by Foxcon and other OEMs. I'm guessing those OEMs have lower production costs than HP factories, especially those in North America and Europe.

kresh 19 Years · 372 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallwheels

Ascetics probably wouldn't consent to be blown either. Just say'in.

nice

Ascetics:
suggesting the practice of severe self-discipline and abstention from all forms of indulgenceApple will not indulge you the convenience of ports in the front.